Volvo Cars and Autoliv team up with NVIDIA to develop advanced systems for self-driving cars
Aston Martin confirms limited production run of all-electric RapidE for 2019

Study finds anthropogenic PM and dust undercutting global solar energy production

According to a new study led by a team at Duke University, airborne particulate matter and dust are cutting solar photovoltaic energy output by more than 25% in certain parts of the world, with roughly equal contributions from ambient PM and PM deposited on photovoltaic surfaces. The regions hardest hit are also those investing the most in solar energy installations: China, India and the Arabian Peninsula. An open-access paper on the study appears in the ACS journal Environmental Science & Technology Letters.

With colleagues at the Indian Institute of Technology-Gandhinagar (IITGN) and the University of Wisconsin at Madison, Michael Bergin, professor of civil and environmental engineering at Duke University and lead author of the study, measured the decrease in solar energy gathered by the IITGN’s solar panels as they became dirtier over time. The data showed a 50% jump in efficiency each time the panels were cleaned after being left alone for several weeks.

Percent reduction in visible solar energy due to ambient PM (plus a small contribution from ozone) (A), only dust PM deposition (B) deposition of all PM components (C), and atmospheric and deposited combined (D; note change in scale). Credit: ACS, Bergin et al. Click to enlarge.

My colleagues in India were showing off some of their rooftop solar installations, and I was blown away by how dirty the panels were. I thought the dirt had to affect their efficiencies, but there weren’t any studies out there estimating the losses. So we put together a comprehensive model to do just that.

—Michael Bergin

The researchers also sampled the grime to analyze its composition, revealing that 92% was dust while the remaining fraction was composed of carbon and ion pollutants from human activity. While this may sound like a small amount, light is blocked more efficiently by smaller man-made particles than by natural dust. As a result, the human contributions to energy loss are much greater than those from dust, making the two sources roughly equal antagonists in this case.

The manmade particles are also small and sticky, making them much more difficult to clean off. You might think you could just clean the solar panels more often, but the more you clean them, the higher your risk of damaging them.

—Michael Bergin

Having previously analyzed pollutants discoloring India’s Taj Mahal, Bergin already had a good idea of how these different particles react to sunlight. Using his earlier work as a base, he created an equation that accurately estimates the amount of sunlight blocked by different compositions of solar panel dust and pollution buildup.

In addition to the grimy buildup on solar panels, the ambient particles in the air also have a screening effect.

For that half of the sun-blocking equation, Bergin turned to Drew Shindell, professor of climate sciences at Duke and an expert in using the NASA GISS Global Climate Model.

Because the climate model already accounts for the amount of the sun’s energy blocked by different types of airborne particles, it was not a stretch to estimate the particles’ effects on solar energy. The NASA model also estimates the amount of particulate matter deposited on surfaces worldwide, providing a basis for Bergin’s equation to calculate how much sunlight would be blocked by accumulated dust and pollution.

The resulting calculations estimate the total loss of solar energy production in every part of the world. While the United States has relatively little migratory dust, more arid regions such as the Arabian Peninsula, Northern India and Eastern China are looking at heavy losses—17 to 25% or more, assuming monthly cleanings. If cleanings take place every two months, those numbers jump to 25 or 35%.

There are, of course, multiple variables that affect solar power production both on a local and regional level. For example, a large construction zone can cause a swift buildup of dust on a nearby solar array.

The Arabian Peninsula loses much more solar power to dust than it does manmade pollutants, Bergin said. But the reverse is true for regions of China, and regions of India are not far behind.

China is already looking at tens of billions of dollars being lost each year, with more than 80 percent of that coming from losses due to pollution. With the explosion of renewables taking place in China and their recent commitment to expanding their solar power capacity, that number is only going to go up.

We always knew these pollutants were bad for human health and climate change, but now we've shown how bad they are for solar energy as well. It’s yet another reason for policymakers worldwide to adopt emissions controls.

—Michael Bergin

This work was supported by the US Agency for International Development and the Office of the Vice Provost for Research at Duke University.


  • Mike Bergin, Chinmay Ghoroi, Deepa Dixit, Jamie Schauer, Drew Shindell (2017) “Large reductions in solar energy production due to dust and particulate air pollution,” Environmental Science & Technology Letters, doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00197



It has often struck me that it must be difficult to keep solar panels clean in dusty or sandy areas, like Saudi Arabia, especially if they are water constrained.
As the paper says, the more you clean them, the more you risk damaging them, so it is really not a simple task. Perhaps a special hoover could be constructed, and / or an ultrasonic cleaner.
It is a big problem (loss of solar power) and one that demands a serious response.
You might have to design solar panels that are supposed to be removed once a year and cleaner or resurfaced (or whatever).
(Which won't be cheap).


The dust on my panels here in California the dust is lighter color, which is more transparent and does not affect the panels more than 10% at peak power, not sure about off peak. I could see how black carbon would have a much bigger effect.


An ultra thin, ultra resistant Gorilla III (or the next generation Gorilla IV) glass cover helps.

Reducing local dust and other particle sources may be the final solution?


Good point Harvey, but at what cost ?
How much do large sheets of GG cost ?


At Ketura Sun, a large commercial solar field in Israel, the solar panels are being cleaned in a unique way: by robots. That's not the most unique part. These robots don't use any water in the cleaning process, making them a great match for the Negev desert where the solar plant is located. Even better, the robots could go a long way toward making solar power plants less dependent on water.

According to Gizmag, the Ecoppia E4 robots are "mounted on a frame that moves laterally along the panels and the robots themselves move up and down the panels. They use a rotating brush made up of soft microfiber in conjunction with air blowers to remove what Ecoppia says is 99 percent of dust build-up." No water required.


And for those of you who like watching youtube the waterless robot cleaner is here;

The comments to this entry are closed.