Woods Hole awarded $5.7M for seaweed-to-biofuels projects
08 October 2017
Researchers at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) have been awarded $5.7 million from the Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy (ARPA-E) Macroalgae Research Inspiring Novel Energy Resources (MARINER) Program for two projects that develop tools and technology to advance the mass production of seaweed for biofuels and bio-based chemicals. The two WHOI awards are among 18 innovative projects that received a total of $22 million in funding from ARPA-E. (Earlier post.)
Currently in the US, seaweed is primarily used in food and food processing for humans and animals, and mostly comes from imported farmed product or wild harvests. Expanding seaweed farming domestically relieves pressure on wild stocks, creates jobs and revitalizes working waterfronts. Ultimately expanded and more efficient production will lead to expanded markets including feedstocks for biofuels. The ARPA-E estimates that in the US combined brown and red seaweed farming could yield about 300 million dry metric tons per year. When converted to energy, that could fuel about 10% of the nation’s annual transportation needs.
The MARINER program addresses a critical challenge that land production systems are unlikely to solve. How do we meet growing global biofuel needs and also meet the 50 to 100 percent increase in demand for food expected by 2050? Seaweed farming avoids the growing competition for fertile land, energy intensive fertilizers, and freshwater resources associated with traditional agriculture.
—Scott Lindell, who is leading the research effort at WHOI
With $3.7 million, Lindell and a team of seaweed biologists, geneticists and entrepreneurs will develop a breeding program for sugar kelp—Saccharina latissima, one of the most commercially important species—using the latest gene sequencing and genomic resources for faster, more accurate and efficient selective breeding. The breeding program will build a library of genetic resources associated with plant traits that produce a 20 to to 30 percent improvement over wild plants. Lindell says the team expects to develop novel genomic tools that will accelerate the production of improved plants while decreasing the need for costly offshore field evaluations.
Partners in the project include: University of Connecticut-Stamford, which will develop the kelp strains and families for breeding; the USDA Agriculture Research Service at Cornell, which will apply DNA sequencing and genomic analysis to direct selective breeding for important traits; and GreenWave, which will operate the open ocean farming system for field trials of the selectively bred families.
The remaining $2 million in funding will be used by a team from the Applied Ocean Physics and Engineering department to develop an autonomous underwater observation system for monitoring large-scale seaweed farms for extended periods of time without human intervention.
The really cool thing about the ARPA-E MARINER program is that it funds both the development of the farming technology and the development of the monitoring technology side-by-side.
—researcher Erin Fischell, who will lead the vehicle project
The WHOI team will outfit an unmanned underwater vehicle with acoustic, optical, and environmental sensors to monitor seaweed growth and health, equipment status, and water column properties, such as nutrient content.
The WHOI-lead project teams will collaborate with a third MARINER project awarded to a team led by the University of Alaska Fairbanks. That project is developing scale model seaweed farms capable of producing sugar kelp for less than $100 per dry metric ton. Lindell will lead biological sampling and testing at seaweed farm sites in New England—Nantucket Sound and Long Island Sound—and Alaska.
Another way to use seaweed is to add it to cattle feed to reduce the methane emissions from cattle.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/ireland-cows-methane-emissions-climate-change-supercows-james-cook-university-a7849646.html
Might be a better way than using it for biofuels (in terms of CO2/Ch4 avoided / Kg seaweed).
Posted by: mahonj | 08 October 2017 at 07:43 AM
Using biofuel is no answer to pollution; you still use it in internal combustion engines and create smog of a different nature; but. still detrimental to people's health and the Planet.
Ask the people in Brazil about burning sugar cane(ethanol):
http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-ethanol-ozone-levels-brazil-20140501-story.html
Posted by: Lad | 08 October 2017 at 08:21 PM
Better is to use seaweed to feed people, than to feed cattle. And stop eating animals.
www.cowspiracy.com
Posted by: Ing. A.S.Stefanes | 08 October 2017 at 11:44 PM
@Stefanes, well that is another question entirely.
Should we go "low meat", vegetarian or vegan or stay "full meat" - a good question.
I would tend towards the "low meat" myself, but while we are at it, we might as well feed the cows with food that creates the least greenhouse gases.
I used to wonder if you could make an oxidising filter (like a catalytic converter) for cow barns and feedlots where you could extract the exhaust gases from the cows and oxidise them to CO2, a much less bad gas than Ch4.
Posted by: mahonj | 09 October 2017 at 01:34 AM