Cisco and Hyundai to bring “hyper-connected” car to production in 2019; software defined vehicle architecture
DOE analysis suggests rapid convergence of FCEV and BEV TCOs; FCEVs less expensive for majority of LDV fleet by 2040; mass compounding

Chevrolet and Ford cruise into Detroit Auto Show leading with truck introductions

Chevrolet and Ford each are entering the Detroit Auto Show this week on the heels of major truck introductions: for Chevrolet, the next-generation Silverado full-size pickup; for Ford, the return of the Ranger mid-size pickup.

Silverado. The introduction of the next-generation Silverado comes 100 years after the brand delivered its first trucks to customers in January 1918. Chevrolet says that the all-new Silverado sets the course for the next century of Chevy Trucks with the most functional bed of any full-size truck, weighs up to 450 pounds less for increased performance and offers a broad range of trims and engine/transmission combinations—including a 3.0L diesel and 5.3L and 6.2L V-8s with industry-first Dynamic Fuel Management that actively shuts off any number of cylinders, in a variety of combinations, depending on immediate needs to optimize fuel economy.

Chevrolet now offers diesel engines in more segments and models than any other brand, including Equinox, Cruze, Colorado, Express, Silverado 1500, Silverado HD and upcoming Silverado medium-duty models.

Both the 3.0L diesel and 6.2L engines are paired with a new Hydra-Matic 10-speed automatic transmission as well as start/stop technology to improve fuel economy.

The 2019 Silverado is larger than before, including a wheelbase that is up to 3.9 inches (100 mm) longer and an overall length that is 1.6 inches (41 mm) longer, enabling both more cargo volume and more interior room for all cab lengths. It’s also lighter, weighing 450 pounds (204 kg) less than today’s truck when comparing crew cab V-8 models.

The weight savings comes from extensive use of mixed materials and advanced manufacturing processes throughout the next-gen truck. For example, the body is 88 pounds (40 kg) lighter than before due to mixed materials use. All exterior swing panels (doors, hood and tailgate) are made of aluminum while fixed panels (fenders, roof and bed) are made of steel. The underlying safety cage uses seven different grades of steel, each tailored for the specific application.

The fully boxed steel frame is also 88 pounds (40 kg) lighter than its predecessor, while offering 10% greater torsional rigidity. Eighty percent of the frame is made of high-strength steel varying from 2 to 5 millimeters in thickness, and every millimeter is optimized for performance using a variety of processes, including hydroforming, roll forming, conventional stamping and tailor-rolled blanking. As a result, frame sections, gauges, grades, processes and materials strategically vary to maximize strength, durability and stiffness without adding unnecessary mass.


Mixed materials also play a part in the all-new suspension. The front independent short/long arm suspension features new forged-aluminum upper control arms that are lighter and provide better wheel alignment than the stamped component they replace. The live-axle rear suspension is also redesigned, including new carbon-composite second-stage springs on LT models that save about 12 pounds (5 kg) per side over the steel springs they replace.

Ranger. Production of the 2019 Ranger begins late this year at Ford’s Michigan Assembly Plant as customer demand is growing for midsize trucks. US sales are up 83% since 2014 as a new generation of midsize truck buyers seek more maneuverable, fuel-efficient pickups.

The 2019 Ford Ranger features a new exterior design, chassis and powertrain developed specifically for North American truck customers. With a high-strength steel frame, Ranger is equipped with a proven 2.3-liter EcoBoost engine mated to a 10-speed automatic transmission.

The 2.3-liter EcoBoost engine features direct fuel injection, a twin-scroll turbocharger and 16-valve design. For added durability, the engine features a forged-steel crankshaft and connecting rods, and chain-driven dual overhead cams.



I'm sorry, but here in the states the F150 is compared to beer cans and soda cans because of its use of aluminum. People in the GM camp camp legitimately feel unsafe in an aluminum truck or so I am told. I am laughing right now.

I knew the day would come when GM would add aluminum to the mix, just figured they would wait 4 years after their anti aluminum campaign was over. Give their fan base some time to forget the rhetoric. I bet their engineers were shaking their heads during those commercials in the past, now the pr department has to spin it.

So, is the new North American Ranger not a world design? Or it it just a trim kit? The ones I saw last few weeks on the road looked nice, don't know why we in America have to add chrome to everything. That's probably what they mean by: "features a new exterior design, chassis and powertrain developed specifically for North American truck customers"
I don't see a point to the ranger, it's very close to size and price of an F150, but no where near as capable.

In my polarizing thoughts two type of people own these sorts of midsize trucks, ones who would never tow haul anything other than once or twice a year(to the ire of many on here), or someone who would dangerously overload one of these constantly. I just remember watching people with small pickups trying to put >1500 pounds of landscaping supplies in the back.

The 2.3L won't do much but upset most customers. It won't tow much, and it needs a light touch to get the rated economy numbers that one might expect. Ecoboost are amazing engines, but they are fun engines, and they are designed to be friendly to the public (no turbo lag), if there were lag, fuel economy would be much easier to obtain at freeway speeds. They should offer the 2.7L, and make the gearing stupid long.

For example my engine the 1L turbo, people can get in the upper 50s mpg, but if your freeway speeds go north of 60mph it drops pretty fast due to air resistance and the engine being in boost. Even with my long gears, I still wish I had a longer one, or a double overdrive.

I wish manufactures would design around 75mph, not 55mph, I can always downshift, but being limited, I just feel like I shouldn't want to upshift again. The tenspeed from Ford and GM should mitigate most of the need to have 4.10 ratios, but feel that the range of gearing is still short.



GM's pokes at Ford's use of aluminum have always been with regard to using it in load-bearing body parts. GM uses aluminum on parts that move (door outer, hood, tailgate) but uses ultra high strength steel on body parts that support the mass of the vehicle structure (fenders, roof, bed). That is the essence of the "mixed materials" strategy.


Fords body is aluminum, the frame and supports are steel... I'm not sure what you are trying to say?

There was also controversy over those videos where GM during the tool box drop might have punctured thier own bed too. Also, most truck owners aren't idiots, and don't dump /throw things in the back of a truck without a liner or even with a liner. It was a gimmick, not they'll have to eat thier hat.

Honda has videos too, thier composite bed is great until you have a flat.

The comments to this entry are closed.