Lincoln introduces new Aviator SUV with plug-in hybrid model option
Volvo Cars expands Silicon Valley tech center

USGS analysis shows 2018 California wildfires emitted as much CO2 as an entire year’s worth of electricity for the state

According to data analyzed by the US Geological Survey (USGS), the 2018 wildfire season in California is estimated to have released emissions equivalent to roughly 68 million tons of carbon dioxide. This number equates to about 15% of all California emissions, and it is on par with the annual emissions produced by generating enough electricity to power the entire state for a year.

The recent Camp and Woolsey fires have produced emissions equivalent to roughly 5.5 million tons of carbon dioxide.

We know that wildfires can be deadly and cost billions of dollars, but this analysis from the US Geological Survey also shows just how bad catastrophic fires are for the environment and for the public’s health. There’s too much dead and dying timber in the forest, which fuels these catastrophic fires. Proper management of our forests, to include small prescribed burns, mechanical thinning, and other techniques, will improve forest health and reduce the risk of wildfires, while also helping curb the carbon emissions. The intensity and range of these fires indicate we can no longer ignore proper forest management. We can and must do a better job of protecting both the forests and the communities on the urban-wildland interface. Leaving forests unmanaged is no longer a safe option.

—US Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke

These preliminary estimates were produced using provisional data from this year’s wildfire season. The USGS compared that to the emissions produced by California’s electricity (imported and produced in-state) during the entire year of 2016, which was roughly 76 million tons according to data provided by the California Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory.



All of this could have been prevented by harvesting the dead timber before it had a chance to burn.  This probably could have been done AT A PROFIT.



BIG difference is that it not fossil carbon, it's cycling the carbon that is already in the biosphere


Carbon is carbon, and when forest burns a lot of carbon-uptake capacity is destroyed and takes many years to replace.


Just been through a similar historic fire event in Qld including rainforest areas.
There is not a lot of media accessible reporting on it yet.
As there is no precedent it is not appropriate to make forecast or assumtions but we should hold grave fears from the implications to including diversity and species reductions - which is just a nice way of saying permanent loss of and accelerating extinction.
A bit of background can be gleaned from this news report.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)