ITM Power extends hydrogen fueling agreement with Shell in UK to 2024
GlobalData: Nigeria will dominate crude production from greenfield projects in sub-Saharan Africa over next 6 years

Waterloo power management strategy greatly enhances durability of on-board fuel cells in FC-PHEV

Researchers at the University of Waterloo (Canada), with a colleague in Sweden, have used a power management strategy greatly to extend the durability of onboard fuel cells in a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle: an increase of 1.8, 4.8 and 6.9 times, respectively, for an urban, highway and a combined urban-highway driving cycle. A paper on their work is published in the journal Applied Energy.

Fuel cell plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (FC-PHEVs) can have extended range while utilizing cheap grid electricity, but has poor durability of onboard fuel cells due to dynamic loading. In this study, fuel cell durability is enhanced significantly for a novel configuration of FC-PHEVs with three fuel cell stacks through strategic power management by making each fuel cell stack work only at a fixed operating point (i.e., constant output power) and by shortening its active time (operation) via on-off switching control. A hysteresis control strategy of power management is designed to make the active time evenly distributed over the three fuel cell stacks and to reduce the number of on-off switching.

… This enhanced fuel cell durability is derived from the fact that the average power demand of real-time driving cycles is only a fraction of the maximum power that FC-PHEVs could provide, and substantially increased durability can be used to reduce the over-design, hence the cost, of fuel cells.

—Zhang et al.

Over the lifetime of a vehicle, the actual power demand of real-time driving cycle is only a fraction—typically 1/4 to 1/3—of the maximum power a vehicle powertrain system can provide, the researchers reasoned. To exploit this, they devised a three-fuel-cell-stack architecture consisting of two types of power suppliers: three fuel cell stacks and one battery.


Architecture of FC-PHEVs with three fuel cell stacks as considered in the Zhang et al. study. The arrows in the diagram indicate the electrical connection for the power flow.

PEM fuel cells have optimal durability when operating at a fixed load (or output power), with significantly reduced durability for a variable load operation. Thus, each fuel cell stack in the configuration operates only at a fixed operating load condition (hence, fixed output power) when it is activated (or on); otherwise, it is shut down (or off).

The three fuel cell stacks have equal design power rating. The main advantage of this design is to achieve the best durability possible for fuel cells by fixing their operating load and reducing their active time.

With our design approach, the cost could be comparable or even cheaper than gasoline engines. The future is very bright. This is clean energy that could boom.

—Xianguo Li, director of the Fuel Cell and Green Energy Lab at Waterloo


  • Hongtao Zhang, Xianguo Li, Xinzhi Liu, Jinyue Yan (2019) “Enhancing fuel cell durability for fuel cell plug-in hybrid electric vehicles through strategic power management,” Applied Energy, Volume 241, Pages 483-490 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.02.040


No mention of the cost efficiencies of two extra fuel cells vs simply fitting a larger battery.

As batteries drop below $100/kW, that will be a hard act to beat with an extra fuel cell or two, along with attendant pumps and storage tank.

I imagine they must be thinking about large vehicles that have room for really large tanks, like Semis.


Or trains, street-cars, busses, airplanes, and ships / boats,


Yes, this type of more FC operation + higher efficiency will certainly benefit heavy vehicles such as trucks, buses, machinery, trains, ships and future electrified airplanes ++ and others, specially when using clean H2 from REs.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)