Oxis Energy to build plant for mass production of Li-sulfur cells
NIO updates Level 2 advanced driving assistant system NIO Pilot

ETH Zurich: carbon-neutral fuel made from sunlight and air

Researchers from ETH Zurich have developed a novel technology that produces liquid hydrocarbon fuels exclusively from sunlight and air and have demonstrated the entire thermochemical process chain under real field conditions. Their new solar mini-refinery is located on the roof of ETH’s Machine Laboratory building in Zurich.

CO2 and water are extracted directly from ambient air via an adsorption/desorption process. Both are then fed into the solar reactor at the focus of a parabolic reflector. Solar radiation is concentrated by a factor of 3,000, generating process heat at a temperature of 1,500 degrees Celsius inside the solar reactor.

At the heart of the solar reactor is a ceramic structure made of cerium oxide, which enables a two-step reaction—the redox cycle—to split water and CO2 into syngas. This mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide can then be processed into liquid hydrocarbon fuels through conventional methanol or Fischer–Tropsch synthesis.

Carbon-neutral fuels are crucial for making aviation and maritime transport sustainable. ETH researchers have developed a solar plant to produce synthetic liquid fuels that release as much CO2 during their combustion as previously extracted from the air for their production.

Aldo Steinfeld, Professor of Renewable Energy Carriers at ETH Zurich, and his research group developed the technology.

This plant proves that carbon-neutral hydrocarbon fuels can be made from sunlight and air under real field conditions. The thermochemical process utilises the entire solar spectrum and proceeds at high temperatures, enabling fast reactions and high efficiency.

—Aldo Steinfeld

The solar mini-refinery on the roof of ETH Zurich shows that the technology is feasible, even under the climate conditions prevalent in Zurich. It produces around one deciliter of fuel per day. Steinfeld and his group are already working on a large-scale test of their solar reactor in a solar tower near Madrid, which is carried out within the scope of the EU project Sun-To-Liquid.

The next project goal is to scale the technology for industrial implementation and to make it economically competitive.

A solar plant spanning an area of one square kilometer could produce 20,000 liters of kerosene a day. Theoretically, a plant the size of Switzerland—or a third of the Californian Mojave Desert—could cover the kerosene needs of the entire aviation industry. Our goal for the future is to efficiently produce sustainable fuels with our technology and thereby mitigate global CO2 emissions.

—,Philipp Furler, Director (CTO) of Synhelion and a former doctoral student in Steinfeld’s group

Two spin-offs already emerged from Aldo Steinfeld’s research group: Synhelion, founded in 2016, commercializes the solar fuel production technology. Climeworks, founded in 2010, commercializes the technology for CO2 capture from air.

Comments

SJC

Way cool!

Engineer-Poet

The stuff that I'm finding about solar-ceria fuels production mentions methane as the reducing agent.  Not terribly renewable, no.

This solar dish looks to be about 5 meters across.  25 square meters of PV panels at 20% efficiency and 15% capacity factor would produce 5 kW under standard conditions, ~6600 kWh/yr.  Used to drive the electrolytic-ethanol process we've seen here before at 30% energy efficiency and 21.2 MJ/liter of product, it would make 336 liters per year, about 0.92 liters/day.  There would also be a substantial amount of energy-rich byproducts, including ethane.

This plant produces one deciliter/day using roughly the same collection area.  That's 0.1 liter, 1/9 as much.

Who are these people trying to fool?

Davemart

It seems some here are unable to understand what a pilot plant does and does not do.

As they say, it has shown the technical feasibility of the route.

It is absurd to do efficiency calculations and so on based on it.

Engineer-Poet

It is absolutely sensible to do efficiency calculations on pilot plants.  Either there is a route to improving the identified deficiencies, or there isn't.  Without such a route, there are no real prospects for widespread use.

Contrasting the electrolytic ethanol process, it would be:

  • Far easier to deploy as it requires only electricity, not extremely clear (desert) skies.
  • Able to operate on e.g. wind or excess hydro power as well as solar.
  • Apparently much more efficient overall.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)