Report finds one-third fewer polluting vehicles entered central London during ULEZ’ first four months
Robert Bosch Venture Capital invests in Chinese autonomous trucking start-up Trunk

PNNL, OSU team develops a durable, inexpensive molybdenum-phosphide catalyst for efficient conversion of wastewater & seawater into hydrogen

Researchers at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), with colleagues from Oregon State University, have developed PNNL a durable, inexpensive molybdenum-phosphide catalyst that efficiently converts wastewater and seawater into hydrogen. Details of the team’s study appear in the journal ACS Catalysis. The findings stem from a three-year project funded by the Department of Energy’s Fuel Cell Technologies Office.

The researchers tested a molybdenum-phosphide (MoP) catalyst with wastewater in a microbial electrolysis cell (MEC). Test results showed that MoP worked better than platinum, a precious and expensive metal typically used for its high catalytic performance. The MoP catalyst also produced hydrogen five times as fast as other non-platinum catalysts reported in related studies. The catalyst also worked well with seawater.

If you can produce hydrogen from seawater, the resource pool is pretty much unlimited.

—Yuyan Shao, corresponding author

Like seawater, the MoP catalyst material is widely available, and therefore, cheap. The catalyst also worked with wastewater, another ubiquitous resource.

In MECs, an electrical current is coupled with bacteria to decompose organics and make hydrogen. Unfortunately, the cells also use costly platinum for the reaction surface, and if non-platinum catalysts are used, hydrogen yields remain low.

At OSU, researchers developed a hybrid MEC design in which fermentation and electrolysis take place in a single pot as opposed to separate steps, and the byproducts are directly consumed in the process. This integrated design increases productivity and lowers equipment costs. But with the high cost of platinum, the team needed a catalyst that could lower production costs to around two dollars per kilogram of hydrogen.

Building on prior discoveries with the MoP catalyst, PNNL researchers investigated the catalyst for use in MECs. The research team started with the MoP combination because of its affinity for activating, or separating, water molecules. The catalyst is also tunable—the amount of each mineral can be adjusted. According to the team’s hypothesis, this tuning would optimize the amount of hydrogen produced in a single reaction.

They found that the catalyst assembled into a mixture of two distinct crystal phases: MoP and MoP2. The atomic structure for each phase was different, leading to different reactions. While MoP2 released hydrogen atoms from the water molecules, MoP converted the hydrogen atoms to hydrogen gas molecules. The two active sites boosted the overall reaction.

Catalyst-microscope

Colorized high-resolution TEM microscope image shows the catalyst’s two phases, MoP in purple, MoP2 in yellow. Source: PNNL


We did not expect simultaneous formation of the two crystal phases. The two phases work way better than the single phase.

—Yuyan Shao

The researchers ran their experiments under neutral pH conditions in both the hybrid cell at OSU using wastewater and in another reactor at PNNL using seawater, with consistent results. Shao said these findings give the researchers confidence that the method is sound, eliminates platinum and other byproducts, and holds great promise for advancing hydrogen and fuel cell technologies.

In addition to DOE’s Fuel Cell Technologies Office, the materials characterization in this research was supported by DOE’s Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, and PNNL’s Laboratory-Directed Research and Development Program.

Electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectrometer analyses were performed at the William R. Wiley Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL), a national scientific user facility sponsored by the DOE’s Office of Science and located at PNNL.

The OSU and PNNL team will soon be joined by researchers from Texas A&M University on a new project which builds on their research for hydrogen production with MEC. The authors are filing a patent.

Resources

  • Xiaohong Xie, Miao Song, Luguang Wang, Mark H. Engelhard, Langli Luo, Andrew Miller, Yayun Zhang, Lei Du, Huilin Pan, Zimin Nie, Yuanyuan Chu, Luis Estevez, Zidong Wei, Hong Liu, Chongmin Wang, Dongsheng Li, and Yuyan Shao (2019) “Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution in Neutral pH Solutions: Dual-Phase Synergy” ACS Catalysis 9 (9), 8712-8718 doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b02609

Comments

Engineer-Poet

I'm normally skeptical about anything hydrogen but with the removal of organics from wastewater as a co-benefit this could have considerable potential for cost savings.  Methane would be better unless the CO2 was sequestered, though; I do not recall anything about the potential for archaea purifying wastewater as part and parcel of electric-powered methane production but it seems to be a likely option.  Methane has far greater energy density than hydrogen and is much easier to store.

HarveyD

This could become another way to produce huge (almost unlimited) amount of lower cost H2 for near future H2 economy and FCs for fixed energy production services and for ground, sea and air vehicles?

Davemart

Another great job in the write up by Mike, far more clear than others I have seen for this technology,

My view has been that the great bottleneck to a primarily renewables driven economy is storage, and hydrogen and its derivatives are both storable and transportable.

So instead of siting solar panels on rooftops in Germany, where sunshine is limited especially in the winter when demand is highest, or being limited by location for wind, this technology especially considering its very relaxed constraints on water purity can be where land is cheap, or at sea even with floating solar and wind.

We need to see large working installations to be fully confident and to have a proper handle on costs, but so far as can be seen, it is all good.

SJC

Water treatment plants produce methane, CO2 and waste water.
With lower cost H2 they could make bio synthetic hydrocarbon fuels.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)