NI introduces S.E.A. C-V2X Open Loop Test System; 5G tech for V2X
IHS Markit: conventional oil & gas discoveries at lowest levels in 70 years; major rebound unlikely

Study: curbing diesel emissions could reduce mortality rates in big cities

US cities could see a decline in mortality rates and an improved economy through midcentury if federal and local governments maintain stringent air pollution policies and diminish concentrations of diesel freight truck exhaust, according to a new study published in Environment International by researchers at Cornell University, the University of Houston and Changsha University of Science and Technology, China.

Freight transportation is a pillar of the US national economy, but while long-haul trucks account for less than 6% of the vehicle miles traveled over US highways, they account for about 40% of the emissions of air polluting particulate matter and about 55% of nitrogen oxides, the precursor to ozone in the atmosphere, the study said.

The researchers examined the air quality and public health impacts of projected freight-related emissions in 2050 over the continental United States. Three emission scenarios were considered:

  1. A projected business-as-usual socioeconomic growth with freight fleet turnover and stringent emission control (CTR);

  2. The application of a carbon-pricing climate policy (PO); and

  3. Further technology improvements to eliminate high-emitting conditions in the truck fleet (NS).

The PO and NS cases are superimposed on the CTR case.

Using a modeling framework, the researchers quantified the impacts of PM2.5 emissions change on air quality, health, and economic benefits.

  • In the CTR case, they simulated a widespread reduction of PM2.5 concentrations, between 0.5 and 1.5 μg m−3, comparing to a base year of 2011. This translates into health benefits of 3600 (95% CI: 2400–4800) prevented premature deaths, corresponding to $38 (95% CI: $3.5–$100) billion.

  • Compared to CTR case, the PO case can obtain ~9% more health benefits nationally, however, climate policy also affects the health outcomes regionally due to transition of demand from truck to rail; regions with fewer trucks could gain in health benefits, while regions with added rail freight may potentially experience a loss in health benefits due to air quality degradation.

  • The NS case provides substantial additional benefits (~20%).

1-s2.0-S0160412019300376-ga1_lrg

Source: Pan et al.


These results support that a combination of continuous adoption of stringent emission standards and strong improvements in vehicle technology are necessary, as well as rewarding, to meet the sustainable freight and community health goals. States and metropolitan areas with high population density and usually high freight demand and emissions can take more immediate actions, such as accelerating vehicle technology improvements and removing high-emitting trucks, to improve air quality and health benefits.

—Pan et al.

While current federal regulations have emissions limits on new vehicles, the regulations do not affect vehicles already in use, said senior author Oliver Gao, Cornell professor of civil and environmental engineering. Aging trucks, however, can easily degrade from normal to high-emitting conditions. Eliminating super-emitting vehicles completely could further reduce long-haul freight emissions by nearly 70% and provide 20% more health benefits, the researchers said.

The work was supported in part by the US Department of Transportation's Center for Transportation, Environment and Community Health, and the National Science Foundation.

Resources

  • Shuai Pan, Anirban Roy, Yunsoo Choi, ShiQuan Sun, H. Oliver Gao (2019) “The air quality and health impacts of projected long-haul truck and rail freight transportation in the United States in 2050,” Environment International, Volume 130, 104922 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.104922.

Comments

re-re-re-goor7

I have some basic diagrams of a new cylinder ice. It is called c.c.p engine ( central compression piston engine) I can show these diagrams to people interested to try it and buy or use this new inventions. Basically the 4 stroke design become variable with less drag on compression and more power switched to the expansion cycle.

Engineer-Poet

After seeing how clueless you are about basic physics, you're not going to get any serious person to look at your engine unless and until you've built one.  Thermodynamics is quite a bit more difficult than calculating angular inertia, and it's a certainty that your numbers are nonsense.

Rock, Gorr.  Crawl back under it.

re-re-re-goor7

Thanks for your comments. I now need to sell this patents to let's say gm, ford, daihashu, Nissan or some other rich someone as I can sell it for only 10 millions or more. To date nobody have talked seriously with me to buy this patents. Let say that anyone company can buy it and use it as it is almost the same engine as actual engine. Just one more piston into the cylinder. Actually I do 48 mpg but it is easy to do more than 100 mpg, with a c.c.p engine. also I need to hear the medias talk about it as they are preoccupied by all these gasolines fumes.

mahonj

Getting the worst vehicles off the road sounds like the best thing to do in terms of individual health outcomes.
Do a pareto and fix the big hitters on the left of the chart.

Point on the health costs benefits:
.. $38 (95% CI: $3.5–$100) billion.
That from 3.5 to $100 billion for 3600 premature deaths avoided- quite a range of results ...

The comments to this entry are closed.