Mitsubishi Motors to unveil small PHEV SUV concept with four motors and gas turbine range extender
California ARB grant solicitation for the Hybrid and Zero-Emission Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Project

ICCT makes recommendations for post-Euro 6 light duty vehicle emissions standards

The European Commission has begun work aimed at post-Euro 6 emission standards for on-road vehicles. The International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT)—an independent nonprofit organization founded to provide unbiased research and technical and scientific analysis to environmental regulators—has pitched a paper into the pre-regulations mix.

The paper highlights issues and limitations of the current standards; compares them to current and future regulations in other parts of the world; and makes policy recommendations for light-duty post-Euro 6 standards. The main recommendations are:

The International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) .001

The report expands on the topics in the summary table.

The ICCT commends the commitment of the European Commission to continue to address on-road emissions through a new phase of pollutant emission standards. With this report, the ICCT seeks to bring attention to a long list of important issues. The breadth and depth of topics that must be addressed in the coming months will require uninterrupted efforts of the Commission, its contractors, and all other stakeholders invested in reducing the environmental impact of road transport.

The ICCT will continue to actively contribute in the upcoming process, leading to the release of a strong regulatory proposal by the Commission by the end of 2020 or early 2021. The ICCT expects the post-Euro 6 emission standards to begin implementation in 2025, more than a decade after the first implementation steps of the current Euro 6 standards.

Recommendations For Post-Euro 6 Standards For Light-Duty Vehicles In The EU



Very disappointing! During the last couple of years, everybody seems to complain about how the EU and its authorities have handled emission limits and regulations. Then, you would think that if those who complain the most would come up with their own proposal, it would be much better. However, this is no better. It is worse… much worse! A proposal must be concrete. Lots of empty phrases are of no value. Let me make an analogy from sports: I presume you can all distinguish between a professional runner and a “hobby-jogger”. This is a proposal (for new emission regulations) by the hobby-jogger. There is hardly any point in commenting on details in the proposal. As said initially, very disappointing.


The main recommendations are: ... and there is a huge list with about 50 recommendations. I assume this means all the recommendations, not just the main ones.
However, the first one: "Introduce Fuel and Technology neutral emission limits" is a good idea, especially now that the diesel people know how to get NOx down.


Well, we also heard "Fuel and Technology neutral emission limits" from the EU; and others. Nothing new here either.


After all the criticism they made about EU legislation, couldn't they come up with something better?

The comments to this entry are closed.