Ammonia-salt solvent pretreatment for biomass could significantly reduce cost of cellulosic biofuels
Isuzu and Honda to conduct joint research on fuel-cell-powered heavy-duty trucks

New highly efficient catalyst for photoelectrochemical CO2 reduction toward methane

Researchers at the University of Michigan, McGill University and McMaster University have developed a binary copper−iron catalyst for photoelectrochemical CO2 reduction toward methane. The work, presented in a paper in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), offers a unique, highly efficient, and inexpensive route for solar fuels synthesis.

The calculations of reaction energetics suggest that Cu and Fe in the binary system can work in synergy to significantly deform the linear configuration of CO2 and reduce the high energy barrier by stabilizing the reaction intermediates, thus spontaneously favoring CO2 activation and conversion for methane synthesis.

Experimentally, the designed CuFe catalyst exhibits a high current density of −38.3 mA⋅cm−2 using industry-ready silicon photoelectrodes with an impressive methane Faradaic efficiency of up to 51%, leading to a distinct turnover frequency of 2,176 h−1 under air mass 1.5 global (AM 1.5G) one-sun illumination.

—Zhou et al.

The solar-powered catalyst is made from abundant materials and works in a configuration that could be mass-produced. The researchers think that it could be recycling smokestack carbon dioxide into clean-burning fuel within 5-10 years.

Thirty percent of the energy in the US comes from natural gas. If we can generate green methane, it’s a big deal.

—Zetian Mi, U-M professor of electrical engineering and computer science, who co-led the work with Jun Song, professor of materials engineering at McGill University

The chief advance is that the team has harnessed relatively large electrical currents with a device that should be possible to mass produce. It’s also especially good at channeling that electricity toward forming methane, with half of the available electrons going toward methane-producing reactions rather than toward by-products such as hydrogen or carbon monoxide.

Previous artificial photosynthesis devices often operate at a small fraction of the maximum current density of a silicon device, whereas here we operate at 80 or 90 percent of the theoretical maximum using industry-ready materials and earth abundant catalysts.

—lead author Baowen Zhou

Turning carbon dioxide into methane is a very difficult process. The carbon must be harvested from CO2, which requires a great deal of energy because carbon dioxide is one of the most stable molecules. Likewise, H2O must be broken down to attach the hydrogen to the carbon. Each carbon needs four hydrogen atoms to become methane, making for a complicated eight-electron dance (each carbon-hydrogen bond has two electrons in it, and there are four bonds).

The design of the catalyst is critical to the success of the reaction.

Song’s theoretical and computational work identified the key catalyst component: nanoparticles of copper and iron. The copper and iron hold onto molecules by their carbon and oxygen atoms, buying time for hydrogen to make the leap from the water molecule fragments onto the carbon atom.

The device is a sort of solar panel studded with nanoparticles of copper and iron. It can use the sun’s energy or an electrical current to break down the carbon dioxide and water.

The base layer is a silicon wafer, not unlike those already in solar panels. That wafer is topped with nanowires, each 300 nanometers (0.0003 millimeters) tall and about 30 nanometers wide, made of the semiconductor gallium nitride.

Green-methane-from-artificial-photosynthesis-could-recycle-co2

An electron microscope image shows the semiconductor nanowires. These deliver electrons to metal nanoparticles, which turn carbon dioxide and water into methane. Image credit: Baowen Zhou


The arrangement creates a large surface area over which the reactions can occur. The nanoparticle-flecked nanowires are covered with a thin film of water.

The device can be designed to run under solar power alone, or the methane production can be amped up with a supplement of electricity. Alternatively, running on electricity, the device could potentially operate in the dark.

In practice, the artificial photosynthesis panel would need to be connected to a source of concentrated carbon dioxide—for example, carbon dioxide captured from industrial smokestacks. The device may also be configured to produce synthetic natural gas (syngas) or formic acid, a common preservative in animal feed.

The research is funded by Emissions Reduction Alberta and the Natural Sciences, Engineering Research Council of Canada, and the Blue Sky Program at the U-M College of Engineering. U-M holds multiple patents on this catalyst and is seeking partners to bring it to market.

Resources

  • Baowen Zhou, Pengfei Ou, Nick Pant, Shaobo Cheng, Srinivas Vanka, Sheng Chu, Roksana Tonny Rashid, Gianluigi Botton, Jun Song, and Zetian Mi (2020) “Highly efficient binary copper−iron catalyst for photoelectrochemical carbon dioxide reduction toward methane” PNAS doi: 10.1073/pnas.1911159117

Comments

Engineer-Poet

There isn't enough gallium.  The price has recently soared to $650/kg:

http://terratechmedia.com/gettingscarcer/

Roger Brown

Recyling CO2 from coal fired power plants is not much use if you believe that we need to head towards a net zero carbon economy relatively rapidly. On the other hand recycling the CO2 from gas fired turbines into CH4 could provide a path to net zero electricity production. I suspect, however that, ignoring the energy storage aspect, direct electricity production by conventional solar panels will much cheaper than this method. However, if some amount of long term energy storage (e.g. Summer to Winter) is needed then such a CO2 recycling scheme is a potential candidate. I have read a similar proposal in the past with CH3OH (methanol) as the energy carrier rather than methane.

Paroway

How is a process that turns a greenhouse gas into another greenhouse gas that is tens of time worse, considered an advance?

The comments to this entry are closed.