NTSB issues 9 safety recommendations after Tesla crash investigation; says no vehicle in US is self-driving
California cumulative PEV sales at 13.4% of 2030 goal; true ZEVs at 7.6%

Consumer Reports calls for major safety improvements across auto industry after NTSB findings in Tesla investigation

In light of new findings by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) related to investigation of a fatal Tesla crash in 2018 related to Tesla Autopilot, Consumer Reports called for manufacturers to include key safety features in any vehicle that has an active driving assistance system and for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to ensure that is the case.

This shouldn’t be considered optional. Manufacturers and NHTSA must make sure that these driver-assist systems come with critical safety features that actually verify drivers are monitoring the road and ready to take action at all times. Otherwise, the safety risks of these systems could end up outweighing their benefits.

The evidence is clear, and continuing to pile up, that if a car makes it easier for people to take their attention off the road, they’re going to do so—with potentially deadly consequences. So far, federal safety regulators have done little to reduce these risks, and the NTSB makes clear that NHTSA’s hands-off approach is far too weak. It’s time for NHTSA to go beyond mere words and take some real, forceful action to keep people safe.

—Ethan Douglas, senior policy analyst for cars and product safety at Consumer Reports

CR’s call comes as the NTSB released a preliminary report on the fatal March 2018 crash of a Tesla vehicle with Autopilot engaged. (Earlier post.) The NTSB attributed the crash to several factors, including Autopilot’s limitations and “cell phone distraction.”

The investigative board also reiterated that regulators and manufacturers alike have ignored the NTSB’s previous recommendations for system safeguards, and called for an overhaul of how manufacturers design their active driving assistance systems to ensure a human driver stays engaged and ready to take action.

CR previously stressed the need for effective systems to verify driver engagement after the NTSB released the results of its investigation into an Uber test vehicle that struck and killed an Arizona woman in 2018.



They also noted that the only manufacturer who failed to respond to the NTSB's concerns was Tesla.

Clearly they are hopping mad with the NHTSA for not taking action to enforce it on Tesla, who get a free pass.

In any case it is absurd that safety critical software can be modified by an OTA without re-certification.

Tesla uses customers to beta test on the public roads.

The comments to this entry are closed.