Ozinga Energy and Ingevity to field adsorbed natural gas bi-fuel pickup
Volvo Cars sales return to growth in China, but down 43.8% in April y-o-y overall; plug-in share doubles to 14%

Researchers develop new composite membrane for direct ethanol fuel cells

Researchers from IPEN in Brazil, Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin (HZB) in Germany, and INRA in Canada have developed a novel composite membrane for direct ethanol fuel cells. A paper on their work is published in the Journal of Membrane Science.

Ethanol has five times higher volumetric energy density (6.7 kWh/L) than hydrogen (1.3 kWh/L) and can be used safely in fuel cells for power generation. Nissan, for one, is investigating the potential for ethanol-fueled solid-oxide fuel cells. (Earlier post.)

In Brazil in particular there is great interest in better fuel cells for ethanol as all the country distributes low-cost ethanol produced from sugar cane. Theoretically, the efficiency of an ethanol fuel cell should be 96%, but in practice at the highest power density it is only 30%, due to a variety of reasons.

A team led by Dr. Bruno Matos from the Brazilian research institute IPEN is therefore investigating novel composite membranes for direct ethanol fuel cells. A promising solution is tailoring new polymer-based composite electrolyte materials to replace the state-of-the-art polymer electrolyte such as Nafion.

Matos and his team used a melt-extrusion process to produce the composite membranes of Nafion and titanate nanotubes functionalized with sulfonic acid groups for testing in a direct ethanol fuel cell.

230867_web

The membrane consists of Nafion with embedded titanate nanotubes. Credit: B.Matos/IPEN


At the BESSY II ring at HZB, they were able to observe in detail how the nanoparticles in the Nafion matrix are distributed and how they contribute to increase proton conductivity.

Matos’ team has now thoroughly analysed four different compositions of Nafion composite membranes at the infrared beamline IRIS at BESSY II. Small-angle X-ray scattering measurements confirmed that the titanium particles were synergistically interacting with the ionomer matrix of Nafion.

Using infrared spectroscopy, they observed that chemical bridges were formed between the sulfonic acid groups of the functionalized nanoparticles. In addition, by following the proton motion along the ionic clusters, they found increased proton conductivity in the composite membrane, even at high concentrations of nanoparticles.

“This was a real surprise that we didn’t expect,” Dr. Ljiljana Puskar, HZB-scientist at the IRIS-Beamline said. The reduction of the conductivity with the increment of the nanoparticles is one of the main hurdles delaying the development of high-performance composite materials. The higher proton conductivity could allow better charge carrier mobility and thus increase the efficiency of the direct ethanol fuel cell.

Resources

  • B.R. Matos, C.A. Goulart, B. Tosco, J.S. da Silva, R.A. Isidoro, E.I. Santiago, M. Linardi, U. Schade, L. Puskar, F.C. Fonseca, A.C. Tavares (2020) “Properties and DEFC tests of Nafion - Functionalized titanate nanotubes composite membranes prepared by melt-extrusion,” Journal of Membrane Science, Volume 604 doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118042.

Comments

SJC_1

This could be interesting.

Peter_XX

@SJC_1
Yeah, but only if efficiency is high (preferably approaching 96%); not around 30%. I see no information about efficiency (?). The case for the direct methanol fuel cell is similar. Interesting, but not feasible at current efficiency levels.

SJC_1

You are not going to get 90% efficiency with any PEM.
More efficient than an ICE with less pollution, no foreign oil dependence.

Peter_XX

Then, the efficiency should be higher than 45% since this can be achieved in a rather conventional diesel engine running on ethanol. Moreover, a practical hydrogen fuel cell seems to be limited to about 60%. This should also be compared to a level of up to 55%, which seems feasible with an advanced diesel cycle and compound turbine in a not so distant future. Options, or extensions to turbo compounding, could be a rankine bottoming cycle, dissociation of ethanol, or a more advanced combustion cycle (e.g. something like HCCI). A fuel cell has "cool" exhaust and no option for recovering waste energy. It is not as if a fuel cell, per definition, would be superior. Moreover, it is not easy to aim at a moving target. Nevertheless, the use of alcohol fuels in fuel cells would overcome the problems in the distribution and storage of hydrogen. This is, more or less, a show-stopper today.

The comments to this entry are closed.