ITER beginning assembly of fusion reactor tokamak
ABB partners with Vigor selects ABB as propulsion and energy storage partner for hybrid-electric ferries

Silica-based cathode enables long-life Li-S batteries

Scientists from the Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology, Korea, have developed a novel silica-based cathode for lithium–sulfur batteries, thereby enabling the realization of batteries that can last for more than 2,000 charge/discharge cycles.

The possibility of successfully using the unconventional silica could spark a paradigm shift in rechargeable battery designs, the researchers said.

Lithium–sulfur batteries—composed of a sulfur-based cathode and lithium anode submerged in a liquid electrolyte—are promising candidates to replace the ubiquitous lithium-ion battery because of their low cost and the non-toxicity and abundance of sulfur.


Schematic representations of a) synthesis process of pOMS/S composite, b) electrochemical reaction of the pOMS/S in LSB and c) the dis- charge–charge processes at the cathode. Lee et al.

However, using sulfur in batteries is tricky for two reasons. First, during the discharge cycle, soluble lithium polysulfides (LiPS) form at the cathode, diffuse into the electrolyte, and easily reach the anode, where they progressively degrade the capacity of the battery.

Second, sulfur is non-conducting. Thus, a conductive and porous host material is required to accommodate sulfur and simultaneously trap LiPS at the cathode. In the recent past, carbon-based host structures have been explored because of their conductivity. However, carbon-based hosts cannot trap LiPS.

In a study published in Advanced Energy Materials, the researchers from the Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology proposed a novel host structure: platelet-ordered mesoporous silica (pOMS). Silica, a low-cost metal oxide, is actually non-conducting. However, silica is highly polar and attracts other polar molecules such as LiPS.

Upon application of a conductive carbon-based agent to the pOMS structure, the initial solid sulfur in the pores of the structure dissolves into the electrolyte, from where it then diffuses towards the conductive carbon-based agent to be reduced to generate LiPS. In this manner, the sulfur effectively participates in the necessary electrochemical reactions despite the silica’s non-conductivity. Meanwhile, the polar nature of the pOMS ensures that the LiPS remains close to the cathode and away from the anode.

The scientists also constructed an analogous non-polar, highly conductive conventional porous-carbon host structure to run comparative experiments with the pOMS structure.

The battery with the carbon host exhibits high initial capacity that soon drops due to the weak interaction between non-polar carbon and LiPS. The silica structure clearly retains much more sulfur during continuous cycles; this results in much greater capacity retention and stability over as many as 2000 cycles.

—Prof Jong-Sung Yu, who led the study

Yet, all this considered, perhaps the most important insight to derive from this study is that host structures for LSBs need not be as conductive as was previously thought.

Our results are surprising, as no one might have ever thought that non-conductive silica could be a highly efficient sulfur host and even outperform state-of-the-art carbon hosts.

—Prof Yu

This study broadens the selection of host materials for LSBs and could lead to a paradigm shift in realizing next-generation sulfur batteries.


  • Lee, B.‐J., Kang, T.‐H., Lee, H.‐Y., Samdani, J. S., Jung, Y., Zhang, C., Yu, Z., Xu, G.‐L., Cheng, L., Byun, S., Lee, Y. M., Amine, K., Yu, J.‐S. (2020) “Revisiting the Role of Conductivity and Polarity of Host Materials for Long‐Life Lithium–Sulfur Battery.” Adv. Energy Mater. 1903934 doi: 10.1002/aenm.201903934



2000 cycles is enough for a car.
If you drive 16000 km / year, at 5 km / kWh, and have a 40 kWh battery, you'll need to fully charge/discharge it 80 times / year, that is 25 years.
So allowing a 50% degradation, it is still 12.5 years, which should be enough for anyone.

Wouldn't work so well for grid buffering, as you might want a full charge / discharge per day, so you are looking at 6 years.

That is assuming everything else works out, and we have seen so many battery announcements over the last 10 years that we should know to be cautious.


sulfur is non-conducting...
That is an obvious issue.


The key thing is:
"Silica, one of the most abundant metal oxides, is low-cost, easy to process..."

Sulfur is also a low cost element
2.000 cycles is a good achievement

I don't even care about energy density at this point, just give us cheaper batteries that last.


Sounds like a good goal, people wonder what it will cost
when the warranty is gone.


warranty is not equal to expected life, this two things may be far apart. Every EV should be designed so that battery outlast the car, just use it as energy storage when the car is not in use anymore.


should ... a bit idealistic.
The reality is they are not.
People know when the warranty is up, the cost is theirs.
They don't miss the obvious.


@gasper et. al. EV batteries don't just suddenly fail, they just retain less and less charge.
People consider >= 80% OK and below that, end of life.
Thus, there is plenty of charge left when a battery is considered finished for a car.
(for stationary use etc.)

The comments to this entry are closed.