Diamond Green Diesel to more than double renewable fuel capacity using second Honeywell Ecofining unit; 675M gallons renewable diesel per year (corrected)
Northwestern team develops solid acid electrochemical cell for the production of hydrogen from ammonia

Advent Technologies to collaborate with Los Alamos, UT Austin, RPI, UNM and Toyota in the development of next-generation HT-PEM fuel cell technology

Hydrogen and fuel cell technology company Advent Technologies will collaborate with Los Alamos National Labs, University of Texas at Austin (UT Austin), Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), University of New Mexico and Toyota Motor North America R&D (TMNA R&D) to continue development of next-generation high-temperature polymer electrolyte membrane (HT-PEM) fuel cell technology for the automotive industry.

The program is funded by an Advanced Research Projects Agency–Energy (ARPA-E) OPEN award.


We at Advent are committed to bringing HT-PEM technology to the market. Drawing on our leadership team’s decades of experience, we intend to commercialize and scale-up membrane electrode assembly (MEA) production while working closely with Tier-1 manufacturers and original equipment manufacturers. We believe that HT-PEM represents not only a breakthrough for heavy-duty automotive technology but also for aviation, portable, and off-grid power generation.

—Dr. Vasilis Gregoriou, Advent’s Founder and CEO

Dr. Emory DeCastro, Advent’s Chief Technology Officer, added that these developments have the potential to drop overall fuel cell system costs by 25% and enable higher power density and simplify packaging constraints.

Furthermore, the potential to use eFuels instead of hydrogen can provide a significantly lower total cost of ownership and allow for faster deployment of fuel cell technology across the industry.

—Dr. DeCastro

The purpose of the development program is to use HT-PEM technology operating at 80 ˚C - 150 ˚C to achieve a variety of objectives, including:

  1. High Energy Efficiency: The target efficiency of the HT-PEM simplified fuel cell system is 70% vs. 60% for current incumbent technology; thereby providing a significant total cost of ownership advantage. This is especially important for long haul trucks using hydrogen fuel cells.

  2. Fast Startup Time: Develop extremely stable fuel-cells that can start under nearly water-saturated conditions.

  3. Superior Heat Management: Completely remove the external humidifiers/demisters and substantially reduce the size of the radiator. Various industry sources have stated that radiators for Class 8 Trucks running with low-temperature polymer electrolyte membrane (LT-PEM) technology are an enormous challenge. There is evidence that the size of the radiator required to run a Class 8 truck in hot and dry conditions (i.e. in places such as Nevada, Australia, Africa and India) is impractical and will pose a huge challenge for the deployment of current fuel cell technology. Next-generation HT-PEM technology aims to solve this problem.

  4. Increase Lifetime: Boost tolerance to impurities and improve performance with platinum and non-platinum catalysts.

  5. Address the hydrogen infrastructure challenge: Allow for the direct reformation of a variety of fuels (natural gas, methanol, ethanol, and zero-carbon emissions eFuels of the future) to low grade (impure) hydrogen within the vehicle, thus bypassing the need for expensive hydrogen storage, transportation, and de/compression technology and hydrogen refill stations.



I'm putting this together with the room temperature CO2 reduction here:

What is shows to me is the potential for a carbon neutral cycle with way higher energy densities than batteries.

All that it takes is just getting it to work! ;-)

Roger Pham

I'd bet SJC would really love this. He has been advocating using on-board reformer to make H2 for FC all along.
70% thermal efficiency is really great and would make on-board reformation of hydrocarbon fuel a worthwhile gain in fuel efficiency AND elimination of exhaust emission associated with combustion engines.
This would be great for general aviation in many ways, including 1.. major gain in reliability of power plant, and far fewer forced landing accidents 2.. reduce fuel weight to permit longer range, or bigger payload 3.. reducing fuel cost thereby major gain in operating cost, since aviation fuel is very expensive. 4.. eliminating pollution, most notably that AV gas still contains lead.


Thanks Roger,
I have advocated this for a while now and I am glad to see it.
Advocating and realizing are two different activities.

The comments to this entry are closed.