Asahi Kasei to produce S-SBR for eco-friendly tires using butadiene derived from plastic waste and biomass
Wärtsila, RINA, others partner on hydrogen fuel solution for shipping via on-board LNG reforming with carbon capture

Researchers use satellite data to show vehicles are an under-recognized source of urban ammonia pollution

By disrupting normal societal activities such as driving, COVID-19 lockdowns afforded a unique opportunity to study their impacts on the environment. Researchers now report in ACS’ Environmental Science & Technology Letters that satellite data from before and during the spring 2020 lockdown in Los Angeles shows that vehicles, rather than agriculture, are the main source of urban airborne ammonia (NH3), which forms small particles that contribute to air pollution and harm human health.

When emitted into the atmosphere, NH3 is converted into tiny particles of inorganic compounds, including ammonium sulfate and ammonium nitrate. On a national or global scale, most NH3 pollution comes from agricultural sources, such as livestock manure. But vehicles also contribute to the problem because their catalytic converters or selective catalytic reduction systems—which are designed to reduce emissions of nitrogen oxide (NOx) pollutants including NO2—have the undesirable side-effect of producing ammonia emissions.

In cities, it’s been hard to tell whether agriculture or traffic emits more NH3, and the default assumption has been that agriculture is the greater culprit, despite some labor-intensive measurement studies that suggested otherwise in a few cities.

Daven K. Henze at the University of Colorado Boulder and colleagues wanted to see if satellite data could be used to answer this question for the first time from space, since such an approach, in principle, could be applied more broadly to urban areas throughout the world.

The researchers focused on western Los Angeles, where previous on-the-ground measurements found that vehicle emissions of NH3 were being underestimated. The team analyzed satellite readings of NH3, as well as NO2. Because the main source of NO2 in the region is on-road transportation, the compound can serve as a proxy for changes in traffic volume and an indicator of vehicular as opposed to agricultural ammonia emissions.

The team correlated concentrations of the two pollutants, and also took meteorological effects into account, to calculate the amount of ammonia emissions that can be traced to vehicles. They found that vehicles accounted for 60% to 84% of total NH3 emissions at this urban location, consistent with estimates provided by modeling, but substantially higher than the 13% to 22% share estimated by government agencies.

The researchers say their findings suggest the health impact of vehicle-related ammonia may rival that of NOx, yet it has been largely under-recognized and uncontrolled.


  • Hansen Cao, Daven K. Henze, Karen Cady-Pereira, Brian C. McDonald, Colin Harkins, Kang Sun, Kevin W. Bowman, Tzung-May Fu, and Muhammad O. Nawaz (2021) “COVID-19 Lockdowns Afford the First Satellite-Based Confirmation That Vehicles Are an Under-recognized Source of Urban NH3 Pollution in Los Angeles” Environmental Science & Technology Letters doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00730



..and what are the impacts on the bigger picture food-chain(not just human health) of these and other airborne pollutants when they are washed into the soil and groundwater by heavy or light rain ?
Frankly I don't need to re-read studies or refresh my memory via new research in order to more or less accurately deduce and predict what the full chain-reaction of (rarely reported !) toxic ripple effects are or might be.
Paul G


I don't need to re-read studies
then don't


More never ending Dieselgate news. Mercedes is looking like a bigger scammer than VW lately.


These harmful toxins like NH3 have been legalized so that the trucks and buses can drive in the area of people. As we all know, there are no comparable limit values for this heavy traffic as there are for cars and small SAVs. I think NOx or NO2 are less toxic than NH3, which is based on Adblue. With NH3 in agriculture and industry, this is extremely dangerous, because one now also wants to develop NH3 as a fuel for large diesel so that ships can also be operated. NH3 is a dangerous breath poison that has been proven, but politics is sleeping.

The comments to this entry are closed.