€33.7M AgiloDrive2 project for electric motor production launches
ABS grants Alfa Laval the marine industry’s first approval in principle (AIP) for firing boilers with methanol

IEF, IHS Markit: deepening underinvestment in hydrocarbons raises specter of continued price shocks and volatility

Underinvestment in oil and gas development extended into a second year in 2021 even as global energy demand rebounded, raising the prospect of price shocks, scarcity and growing energy poverty, according to a new report by the International Energy Forum (IEF) and IHS Markit.

The report underlines concerns about the stability of global energy markets in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and follows a decision by several countries including the United States, Japan and India to release strategic petroleum reserves to cool prices.

The energy crisis in Europe and Asia this winter is a preview of what we can expect in the years ahead. Two years in a row of large and abrupt underinvestment in oil and gas development is a recipe for higher prices and volatility later this decade. More frequent boom-bust cycles will harm consumers and producers recovering from COVID, set back UN Climate and Sustainable Development goals and threaten global security.

—Joseph McMonigle, secretary general, IEF

Upstream investment in the oil and gas sector remained depressed for a second consecutive year in 2021 at $341 billion, 23% below the pre-pandemic level of $525 billion, the report found. Investment slumped by 30% in 2020. Global demand for oil and gas, meanwhile, has rebounded to near 2019 levels and is set to keep rising for several years.

Oil and gas investment will need to return to pre-COVID levels of $525 billion and stay there through 2030 to restore market balance, the report states.

IEF-IHS Markit Investment Report Figure 2

Current non-OPEC production would fall by 20 million barrels per day by 2030 without further upstream capex investment , according to the report. Source: IEF.

However, several factors are currently making it more challenging to meet adequate investment levels this decade compared to decades past, the report says. These include record price volatility, changing government regulations, divergent long-term demand scenarios and non-standardized ESG criteria that are driving up investment hurdles and hiking the cost of capital for long-cycle projects, the report says.

Pressure on governments and industry for a green recovery is further constraining availability of capital, it says. As a result, investment decisions are becoming increasingly complex. The unprecedented level of uncertainty increases the risk profile of hydrocarbon investments and the cost of capital, reshaping investment decisions, the report states.

Additional layers of complexity and the uncertainty that brings is fostering an environment of pre-emptive underinvestment for oil and gas supply, where capital expenditure lags demand.

While the energy transition proceeds, underinvesting in oil and gas before renewables and other low-carbon technologies are ready to scale up to meet energy demand could create recurrent energy crises of the kind we saw in Asia and Europe over the last few months, resulting in elevated prices and adverse economic consequences.

—Daniel Yergin, vice chairman, IHS Markit and author of The New Map: Energy, Climate and the Clash of Nations

The next two years will be critical for sanctioning and allocating capital toward new projects to ensure adequate oil and gas supply comes online within the next 5-6 years, the report states.

Operators will continue to favor projects with access to existing infrastructure as these require less capital, have shorter payback periods, and are more insulated from long-term demand risks. Fear of a mismatch between demand and future supply could start to materialize in this time frame, ,hte report says.

Insufficient upstream investment could result in more price volatility and spur adverse economic consequences, such as wider energy poverty, more frequent scarcity and fuel switching to more polluting energy sources such as wood and coal, the report found.

Increased price volatility would weaken the prospects for the inclusive and sustainable economic recovery that producers, consumers and governments all want. It would also complicate policy choices during the energy transition.

Reduced investment will also make it more difficult to increase affordable access to modern energy services and improve healthy living conditions in rapidly urbanizing regions as well as remote rural areas of developing economies. While the obstacles are high for achieving adequate investment, the consequences of underinvestment are greater.

—Joseph McMonigle

The report was written by Roger Diwan and Karim Fawaz from IHS Markit and Mason Hamilton and Allyson Cutright at the IEF.

The International Energy Forum is the world’s largest organization of energy ministers, comprising 71 members including both producing and consuming nations.



As the investments in oil decline, less oil products will be produced; and, less fuel will be sold to users. The oil companies will, by necessity, raise their prices in order to maintain their profits; which will lead to even less demand and a ever decreasing customer base as car drivers switch to EVs.
But, the oil companies still have a large market in petrochemical, airline and ship fuels that will go on for years.
And. it will be interesting to watch the transition and to see where and how the oil companies invest their resources.


The problem is that investments in oil yield less and less over time; it takes more and more effort to extract a BTU of petroleum, and that does not include the externalized cost of the GHG emissions all along the supply chain.

It is decades past the time to abandon petroleum (and fossil hydrocarbons in general) and go nuclear.  We should have done this no later than the 1960's, but interests like the Rockefellers had way too much political power relative to interests arguing for the future.  Well, the future is now.  California and Siberia have burned.  Canada has flooded.  Worse is coming.  Do we, as a species, have the wisdom to prevent such concentrations of power from ever trying to rule our future again?  I doubt it, and that may likely doom us as well as millions of other species.

The comments to this entry are closed.