Tohoku, UCLA team advance 4V-class metal-free organic Lithium-ion batteries; croconic acid cathode
Researchers report one-pot catalytic conversion of cellulose to methanol

New lignin-based jet fuel blend component opens way for 100% drop-in SAF

Researchers from the University of Dayton, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) and Natural Resources Canada have generated a lignin-based jet fuel (LJF) blend component composed of mostly C6–C18 mono-, di-, and tri-cycloalkanes. The product could complement five existing sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) pathways (ASTM D7566 annexes) to enable a 100% SAF drop-in solution.

A paper on their work is published in the journal Fuel.

Sustainable aviation fuels (SAFs) must demonstrate specific physical and chemical properties as well as material compatibility (i.e., seal swell) to be used as aviation turbine fuels. Several alternative jet fuels incorporated in ASTM D7566 are comprised mainly of n/iso-alkanes and can only be blended up to 50 vol% due to material compatibility and density issues. Prior work illustrated the ability of cycloalkanes to replace the swelling potential of aromatics required for material compatibility.

… The neat LJF was blended with conventional jet fuel at 10 vol% (LJF blend) to simulate a potential qualification goal. Fuel properties critical to engine operability (ATSM D4054 Tier 3 & 4) were either predicted or experimentally tested based on the volume availability.

All LJF-blended operability properties fall within the experience range of conventional jet fuel, with neat o-ring swelling exceeding the typical range of conventional fuels. These results support the potential use of this LJF pathway to complement other SAF pathways and achieve 100% drop-in SAF.

—Yang et al.

Resources

  • Zhibin Yang, Zhangyang Xu, Maoqi Feng, John R. Cort, Rafal Gieleciak, Joshua Heyne, Bin Yang (2022) “Lignin-based jet fuel and its blending effect with conventional jet fuel,” Fuel doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124040

Comments

Albert E Short

So does it exceed "neat o-ring swelling" in a good way or a bad way?

The comments to this entry are closed.