Schlumberger and RTI International partner to accelerate the industrialization of NAS carbon capture technology
EIA: 95% of the fuel ethanol moved in the US in the first half of 2022 moved by rail

BNEF: global carbon capture capacity due to rise sixfold by 2030

The global capacity for carbon capture in 2030 is set to increase sixfold from today’s level, to 279 million tons of CO2 captured per year, according to research company BloombergNEF’s (BNEF) newly released 2022 CCUS Market Outlook. Sharp growth in the market has led to a 44% increase in expected 2030 capacity compared to last year’s outlook.

Carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) is a key technology needed to decarbonize hard-to-abate sectors such as petrochemicals and cement, and to provide 24/7 clean power through gas plants fitted with capture equipment. Still, despite significant acceleration in the sector in the past two years, the world’s capacity for carbon capture is not being deployed fast enough to meet climate goals at the end of the decade, according to BNEF research.

Today, most capture capacity is used to collect carbon dioxide from natural gas processing plants and used for enhanced oil recovery. By 2030, most capture capacity will be used for the power sector, for the manufacture of low-carbon hydrogen and ammonia, or to abate emissions from industrial sources.


The amount of CO2 being captured today is 43 million tons, or 0.1% of global emissions. If all the likely projects that have been announced come online, there would be 279 million tons of CO2 captured every year by 2030, accounting for 0.6% of today’s emissions.

The destination for captured CO2 is also due to change significantly from the status quo. In 2021, some 73% of captured CO2 went to enhanced oil recovery operations. By 2030, storing CO2 deep underground will overtake oil recovery as the primary destination for CO2, with 66% of it going to dedicated storage sites. This change is being driven by legislation that incentivizes storage over CO2 utilization, and by projects that aim to use carbon capture and storage (CCS) as a decarbonization route and must store the CO2 to meet their goals.


Despite rapid growth in capture project announcements, the industry is still far from making a dent in global emissions. In order to be on track for net-zero and less than 2 degrees Celsius of warming by 2050, between one and two billion tons of CO2 would need to be captured in 2030, an order of magnitude higher than current plans. Legislators have recognized this mismatch and are ramping up their support for the industry.

The “Inflation Reduction Act” passed in the US increased tax credits for CCUS by 70%, making a viable business case for the technology in petrochemicals, steel, cement, and in some regions, power. The US tax credits are now very generous, and the law is set to supercharge project announcements in the ethanol and petrochemicals sectors, as well as in direct air capture (DAC), to provide high-quality carbon offsets for the voluntary market.

This 279 million tons of capacity in 2030 is just the tip of the iceberg. We haven’t seen the full impact of these credits yet, making this outlook a fairly conservative view of the future of carbon capture and storage. We expect to see another jump in announcements in 2022, especially in the US as developers there rush to make sure they meet the 2032 deadline for credits.

—Julia Attwood, head of sustainable materials at BNEF

Even before this legislation, direct air capture was booming. Venture capitalists have poured more than $1 billion into the technology this year—more than the total amount invested in DAC up to this point. Companies are already becoming more ambitious in their projects. Soon after the US passed its “Inflation Reduction Act”, a project to build five million tons of carbon removal capacity in Wyoming was announced.

In many industries, CCS is a sunset option to get high emissions assets to the end of their life. But removals are present in every long-term net-zero model. They are here to stay.

—David Lluis Madrid, CCUS analyst at BNEF and lead author of the report



I was very doubtful about underground storage of CO2, but a guy here who is a geology PhD convinced me that it is perfectly practicable.
Annoyingly I have managed to mislay his seminal post on this.

That is a very different matter to air capture, where many posters here make a very good case that the energy costs are prohibitive.


Found it.

It was JamesDo's deeply knowledgeable comment that underground storage of CO2 works fine, in the right conditions, which convinced me.


Entropy laws say DAC is crazy. Looks like DAC will not come close to keeping up with fire CO2 emissions.

The comments to this entry are closed.