UP Catalyst CO2-derived carbon nanotube electrode material boosts cycle life in Na-ion batteries
11 March 2023
Tests conducted by Titirici Group, a multidisciplinary research team based at Imperial College London, have found that a novel carbon nanotube electrode material derived from CO2—produced by Estonian nanotech company UP Catalyst (earlier post)—enhances the cyclability of sodium-ion batteries.
The results showed 93.75% capacity retention after exceeding 4000 charge and discharge cycles. By contrast, the batteries that are currently in widespread use become depleted after just 800 cycles while experiencing a significant reduction in capacity. UP Catalyst’s electrode material also exhibits excellent stability and improved energy density, making it a promising candidate for large-scale energy storage applications.
We are thrilled with the results of these tests and the potential they hold for the future of energy storage. UP Catalyst is committed to reducing the carbon footprint of battery manufacturing and promoting sustainable energy solutions. The development of this new electrode material is a significant step towards achieving these goals, as it not only enhances battery performance, but also helps to mitigate the impact of carbon emissions on the environment.
—Gary Urb, CEO of UP Catalyst
This also means that sodium-ion battery technology could approach and exceed the performance of lithium-ion batteries at a much lower cost and higher efficiency and safety levels. As battery giants like CATL have claimed to have solved the sodium-ion batteries’ energy density problem—the only downfall compared to Li-ion batteries—there is nothing stopping large manufacturers from turning towards mass production of new generation sodium-ion batteries.
HiNa Battery Technology in China, Tiamat in France, Altris in Sweden, and Natron Energy in the US are all commercializing sodium-ion batteries indicating a shift in energy storage technologies. UP Catalyst has now come up with a sustainable electrode material for the battery composition that increases the battery characteristics even further.
P Catalyst uses a molten salt carbon capture and electrochemical transformation method to reprocess the CO2-rich flue gases from heavy industry emitters, biogenic origin and even direct air captured (DAC) CO2. From every 3.7 tons of CO2, one ton of carbon material is produced.
Sounds hopeful. I am not too keen on lithium for bulk storage, as even formulations which cut down on things like nickel and cobalt still use a comparatively scarce material in lithium.
I have little doubt that over time more lithium resources can be developed, but there are still shorter term constraints and cheaper and more abundant materials can reduce costs.
Where weight is not a critical metric, this sounds very useful.
Posted by: Davemart | 11 March 2023 at 03:24 AM
These folk reckon we are ten years away from commercial widely deployed sodium batteries:
https://www.emergingtechbrew.com/stories/2022/08/01/sodium-based-batteries-could-be-the-answer-to-lithium-crunch
Posted by: Davemart | 11 March 2023 at 03:47 AM
NaS
Sodium/Sulfur/Carbon research with a PDF report:
https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms11722
Posted by: Lad | 11 March 2023 at 01:47 PM
Sodium batteries could be game changer soon. China already has sodium battery car on road and Reliance Industry may soon put sodium batteries in cars.
Posted by: Nirmalkumar | 11 March 2023 at 06:38 PM
Hi Lad.
I think you missed that that report is from 2016!
Things have moved on quite a bit since then.
Posted by: Davemart | 11 March 2023 at 11:51 PM
Nirmalkumar:
Sodium batteries work all right,
The problem has been two fold:
How long they last
How much they weigh
For the first, the article we are commenting on addresses longevity, so great for storage.
For weight, it is inherent in the chemistry that it weighs more than lithium.
Adding weight to a car you rapidly get into a game of dimiinishing returns.
The bottom line is that if you are talking a city car with low range, fine, but for longer range a lithium chemistry even at a premium cost works better.
Posted by: Davemart | 11 March 2023 at 11:55 PM
@Davemart,
If I understand the article you linked correctly, those 10 years are estimated for Zhang's work, not for other sodium based chemistries.
I am pretty convinced the rumors about Na-ion batteries coming this year are not that far from reality.
In the other hand, lithium prices (both raw and refined) are going down. I am pretty sure lithium will dominate EVs for a long time, even with sodium alternatives competing.
About this article, growing nanotubes from CO2 seems a really win-win business. Removing high purity CO2 from air it's pretty cheap, and it's carbon negative; if CO2 makes a good feedstock for battery anodes, that's the way to go!
However, no mention to cost is made...
Posted by: peskanov | 12 March 2023 at 12:25 AM
Hi peskanov
I agree.
My own take is that Zhang may be unduly pessimistic, at least for sodium batteries in general rather than his particular variant, but OTOH he clearly knows a bit more about the subject than I!
So I thought it worthwhile linking his article, for folk to make of it what they will.
Posted by: Davemart | 12 March 2023 at 12:59 AM
@peskanov:
On another note, to the question of 'how long does it take for a substantially different technology to come into widespread commercial use?'
The answer is nearly always:
'Longer than you think!' ;-)
I remember when lithium ion batteries were first about in laptops and so on.....
Great balls of fire! :-0
Posted by: Davemart | 12 March 2023 at 01:33 AM
@Davemart,
reading a bit of the paper Zhang published on nature, it seems he is trying to achieve a high voltage (4.2), high density na-ion cell which would be able to compete with li-ion in performance terms.
I think those 10 years refers to that kind of achievement. Low energy density sodium cells would fit in a different category.
Posted by: peskanov | 12 March 2023 at 04:32 AM
@peskanov
The paper is pretty much above my head, but I thought it might be of interest to folk like yourself
Posted by: Davemart | 12 March 2023 at 09:30 AM