LG Magna e-Powertrain expands footprint with new facility in Hungary; 4th plant worldwide
BYD showcases 6 NEVs at IAA

J.D. Power: US growing increasingly divided on EV adoption

According to the latest data from J.D. Power, EV adoption in the US is growing increasingly divided, with the most active states for EV adoption already on the path to parity with internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles and consumers steadily pulling back on EV purchases in the least-active states.

On a nationwide basis, EV adoption rates have continued to rise steadily, with EV sales now representing 8.6% of the total new-vehicle retail market. On a year-over-year basis, overall EV adoption is up 1 point on the J.D. Power 100-point index, bringing the total Adoption score to 21. What’s underneath that nationwide score, however, is significant variation on a state-by-state basis.

Increasingly, the US is splitting into two camps when it comes to EV adoption: those states who’ve been aggressive about offering incentives and building infrastructure to support EVs and those that have not. Accordingly, the top 10 states with the highest overall EV adoption rates—California, Washington, Hawaii, Oregon, Nevada, Maryland, Arizona, Colorado, Utah and Massachusetts—have continued to see EV adoption rates grow steadily, climbing year-over-year through the first half of 2023.

Meanwhile, the states with the lowest levels of EV adoption—Michigan, Iowa, Kansas, Arkansas, Mississippi, Wyoming, Louisiana, South Dakota, West Virginia and North Dakota—have gone in the opposite direction, with adoption rates declining on average in the first half of 2023.


J.D. Power has just introduced a new EV Retail Share Forecast, which captures granular EV sales, consideration, pricing, infrastructure growth and other census and demographic factors to project state-by-state EV adoption rates through 2035. Updated twice per year, the forecast projects EV adoption rates by segment by state and designated market area (DMA) and offers insights into the specific variables contributing to projected growth rates.

At a nationwide level, the EV Retail Share Forecast anticipates a baseline estimate of 70% EV market share by 2035. In line with the state-level trends discussed above, however, those projections vary considerably by state. California, for example, which currently has the highest EV adoption rate in the nation, is projected to reach 94% market share by 2035. North Dakota, by contrast, which currently has the lowest EV adoption rate, is projected to have a 19% EV market share by 2035. Similarly, South Dakota is projected to reach just 35% share and Michigan is projected to reach 41% share by 2035.


Luxury EVs Still Wield Outsize Influence on Affordability. While true parity between the EV and ICE vehicle markets will only be achieved when manufacturers produce more mainstream EVs, the recent news cycle has been dominated with updates on luxury SUVs and trucks like the new Escalade IQ from Cadillac and the Tesla Cybertruck. Even among current EV sales, total affordability scores are being heavily influenced by the Tesla models, which have recently undergone a series of price cuts that has increased their overall affordability. Industry-wide, Tesla currently accounts for 63% of all EV sales year to date.

Driven largely by Tesla, the luxury market skew that currently exists in the EV market has resulted in overall affordability scores improving 15 (on a 100-point scale) through the first half of this year. However, as buyers make their way through this growth phase of the EV marketplace, J.D.Power expects to see continued volatility as new models are introduced and manufacturers continue to put their marketing budgets behind high-priced, halo EVs.


Methodology. This J.D. Power E-Vision Intelligence Report is based on data and insights from the J.D. Power EV Index and the J.D. Power EV Retail Share Forecast. The J.D. Power EV Index is an analytics tool to benchmark the growing EV market in the United States. It tracks millions of data points aggregated into six categories—interest, availability, adoption, affordability, infrastructure and experience—to evaluate the progress to parity of EVs with ICE vehicles in the US. Each month, the J.D. Power electric vehicle practice will analyze these data points, and others to spotlight emerging trends and important shifts in consumer sentiment that are helping to define the fast-moving EV marketplace.

The J.D. Power E-Vision initiative is a company-wide program focused on maximizing J.D. Power industry-leading EV data, analytics, insights and solutions.



Well, BEV and ICE vehicles should never be in competition because BEVs are usually very heavily subsidized. A subsidy may only be given to citizens who earn a maximum of $20,000 per year. All other citizens may not be subsidized because millionaires are not allowed to be subsidized and should be anti-social!

Furthermore, one must of course also say that a good ICE vehicle that will soon be driven with green e-fuels is more ecological than a BEV. BEV are always 60% heavier than ICE vehicles! So why would citizens want to scrap an eco ICE car? We already know that the raw materials for BEVs are already scarce. If the crude BEV policy continues to wander around the world on the BEV wrong path, this policy will plunge the world into further global warming! It is also known that currently only CHINA is making huge profits from the BEV boom! Everything legal? No! Who produces the solar cells and wind turbines for the alleged green electricity???

Crude BEV subsidies that have to end like in Germany:
By the way, the commercial BEV subsidization in Germany ended on August 31, 2023 because it was insanely double!

In Germany, 99% of commercial vehicles of all types and engines/drives are subsidized by the German tax office. All costs for the vehicle are paid by the state! So why again subsidies for the overpriced and extremely heavy SUV BEV or Sedan BEV!

Only private BEV customers are now subsidized by the state! That's finally the way it is and it's the only right way!!!


EVs are too Woke for Red States


LOL @ Dursun

You know what states with no state income tax all have in common? They are "red states." Guess what else? A bunch of those listed here that "aren't incentivizing" also don't have an income tax.

I live in Wyoming and I drive cars for a living. Electric cars are fun and neat, but largely useless here. Most who own them here have it as a commuter--as a second or third car.

We drive long distances in terrible weather and at high altitude and speeds. Compared to, say, the "more woke" Denver area where plugs are plentiful because population density is enormous. But unlike Coloradans, I don't pay a state income tax and I don't have constant stop-and-go traffic to contend with. Just 65-80 mph highways. Guess what sucks when you're at high speed with crosswinds and little civilization for miles? Right. An EV. Then add in multiple passengers and the possibility of cargo and/or trailer. There is not an EV on the market that is good for that. The Lightning is a joke, the Cybertruck is vapor ware, and nearly every EV I've driven gets well below its EPA estimations. None of the rural population of any state is interested in EVs for all those reasons.

Forcing EVs via mandates all of this taxpayer funded incentivization is a terrible way to convince people that something is a good idea. Most Americans aren't interested in being forced. Force and name calling are the methods of tyrants.

Let the EVs compete on the market without incentives. Let them prove their worth without having to force them on us.

The comments to this entry are closed.