Salzgitter orders 100 MW green hydrogen plant from ANDRITZ for low CO2 steel production: SALCOS
Air Liquide to build €400+ million, 200 MW PEM electrolyzer plant in Normandy

Research expedition discovers extensive methane gas leakage from the deepest seabed of the Baltic Sea

During a research expedition led by Linnaeus University and Stockholm University to the deepest parts of the Baltic Sea in the Landsort Deep researchers recently discovered an area with extensive emissions of the powerful greenhouse gas methane from the bottom sediments.

The area where the methane leak was discovered is located in the Landsort Deep (Landsortsdjupet), about 30 kilometers southeast of the coastal town Nynäshamn, Sweden. Christian Stranne, associate professor of marine geophysics at Stockholm University, is surprised by the discovery.

We know that methane gas can bubble out from shallow coastal seabeds in the Baltic Sea, but I have never seen such an intense bubble release before and definitely not from such a deep area.

—Christian Stranne

The research project, funded by the Carl Trygger Foundation, aims to expand knowledge about methane and its sources and sinks in the oxygen-free environments in the deeper parts of the Baltic Sea. The project is led by Marcelo Ketzer, professor of environmental science at Linnaeus University.

Knowledge about the factors that control how much methane is produced in these deeper areas and where the methane goes is limited. How does the system react to, for example, eutrophication or a warmer climate? I knew from one of my previous projects that the methane levels in the sediments in this area are higher than elsewhere in the Baltic Sea, but I never expected methane to bubble out into the sea in this way.

—Marcelo Ketzer

The researchers determined the area’s extent to be about 20 square kilometers (equivalent to almost 4,000 football pitches) and it lies at a depth of around 400 meters. During the expedition, a large number of sediment cores and water samples were collected, and now the researchers hope that further analyses will be able to provide answers to why so much methane gas is released from this specific area.

We already have a pretty good idea of why it looks the way it does. The size of the sediment grains in the area and the form of the seafloorgive us an indication. It seems like deep ocean currents are causing sediments to accumulate in this particular area, but we need to do more detailed analyses before we can say anything definitive.

—Marcelo Ketzer

Another interesting discovery made during the expedition concerns how high up through the water column the methane bubbles rise.

At the depths we are working with here, you can expect the methane bubbles to reach at most perhaps 150-200 meters from the seabed. The methane in the bubbles dissolves in the ocean and therefore they usually gradually decrease in size as they rise towards the sea surface. It is actually quite a complicated balance between pressure effects and diffusion of gases that together determine how size and gas composition develop in a bubble, but the net effect for smaller bubbles is that they lose both size and rise velocity with increased distance from the bottom.

—Christian Stranne

To the researchers’ surprise, they could see some bubbles rising to 370 meters from the ocean floor.

Bubbles from deep-sea sediments (around a thousand meters and deeper) can rise significantly higher due to a coating of “frozen methane” that forms around the bubble. This summer I participated in a French expedition to the Amazon outlet where we observed bubbles rising up to 700 meters above the seabed. But I don’t know of any study where such persistent bubbles have been observed at these depths – it could be a new world record, and it could force us to re-evaluate the role of deep basins in the Baltic Sea, in terms of contribution to the surface water methane content.

—Christian Stranne


With the help of advanced sonar, the researchers can observe the water column and, in this case, the gas bubbles rising from the ocean floor to the surface. The sonar also penetrates the bottom sediments, which provides important information about the properties of the seabed and, for example, whether there is gas hidden in the sediments. Image: Christian Stranne

The researchers have so far not been able to find out exactly how high the bubbles reach. From the sonar, they can see bubbles to at least 40 meters from the sea surface, but it may well be that some bubbles reach significantly higher than that. One of the explanations may be that the bubbles are unusually large, but the researchers have an alternative explanation that they consider more likely.

Rather, we believe that it is linked to the oxygen-free conditions in the deep water of the Baltic Sea. If there is no oxygen, the levels of dissolved methane in the ocean can be relatively high, which in turn leads to the bubbles not losing methane as quickly. The bubbles are thus kept more intact in this environment, which means that methane transport towards the sea surface becomes more efficient. It is a hypothesis that we are currently investigating and if it proves to be correct, it could have consequences—if the oxygen conditions in the Baltic Sea deteriorate further, it would probably lead to a greater transport of methane from the deeper parts of the Baltic Sea, but it remains to be investigated how much may leak into the atmosphere.

—Christian Stranne

Marcelo Ketzer and Christian Stranne believe that methane gas emissions similar to those discovered in the Landsort Deep may also occur in other places in the Baltic Sea.

Now we know what to look for and we look forward to testing this model in other areas of the Baltic Sea with similar geological conditions. There are potentially another half dozen places to explore.

—Marcelo Ketzer



I suppose that the cynical among us may say that this further evidence of nature 'poisoning itself' with emissions rather than the extensive man-made emissions for which we have been hounded to undertake huge lifestyle changes, for our own hubris, over the previous decades. It may also be an opportunity for a power source or to further learn to modify the seafloor for mitigation of such sources. It will be interesting to see how widespread and 'serious' this is.

Steve Reynolds

Why do you talk of nature 'poisoning itself' with emissions?
A stronger greenhouse effect may be inconvenient for humans, but I've not seen any evidence it is bad for life in general.
There is evidence CO2 emissions actually benefit plant life:

Roger Pham

@Jer and Steve,
The warming of the ocean and permafrost tundra cause ice melting and release of methane gas trapped underneath.

Even though higher level of CO2 may benefit plant growth, the higher temperatures and drastic climate change can cause crop failure and extinction of many plant and animal species.

Sea level rising before the end of this century will rob away 1/3 of land mass and due to higher population density in coastal areas, the cost to relocate and rebuild will be in the hundreds of trillion of USD. Don't be too complacent.

It may seem cheaper to continue to burn fossil fuel for the time being, but in the end, we will pay ten times this cost saving of using fossil fuel due to climate change and global warming.

Steve Reynolds

Roger, you are right that warming can cause extinction of some species. But that does not make it bad for life in general. Is there some reason that the exact mix of species we have now is optimum for some measure of life?

"Sea level rising before the end of this century will rob away 1/3 of land mass..."
Do you have a reference for that? It is far beyond anything I see in IPCC reports.

The comments to this entry are closed.