US Department of Transportation announces $25M rural autonomous vehicle research program
Scout Motors to establish R&D center in Michigan

CEC awards $30M to 100-hour, long-duration energy storage project; iron-air battery system

The California Energy Commission (CEC) approved a $30-million grant to Form Energy to build a long-duration energy storage project that will continuously discharge to the grid for an unprecedented 100 hours.

Iron-air battery technology uses the principle of reversible rusting. The battery cells contain iron and air electrodes and are filled with a water-based, nonflammable electrolyte solution. While discharging, the battery absorbs oxygen from the air and converts iron metal to rust. While charging, the application of an electrical current converts the rust back to iron and the battery emits oxygen. The technology has lower costs compared to lithium-ion battery production.

Rust-Iron-Charge-Discharge-AIR-5.10.22

Each individual battery module is about the size of a side-by-side washer/dryer set and contains a stack of approximately 50 one meter-tall cells. These battery modules are grouped together in environmentally protected enclosures. Hundreds of these enclosures are grouped together in modular megawatt-scale power blocks.

For scale, in its least dense configuration, a one megawatt system requires half an acre of land. Higher density configurations would achieve >3 MW/acre.

The 5 megawatt (MW) / 500 megawatt-hour iron-air battery storage project is the largest long-duration energy storage project to be built in California and the first in the state to use the lower-cost technology. It will be built at a Pacific Gas and Electric Company substation in Mendocino County and provide power to area residents. It is expected to begin operation by the end of 2025 to help support grid reliability and demonstrate solutions needed to meet the state’s climate and clean energy goals.

The award is one of three approved under the CEC’s Long-Duration Energy Storage program. The program invests in demonstration of non-lithium-ion technologies across the state to create a diverse portfolio of energy storage technologies.

As of August, California had 6,600 MW of battery storage in use throughout the state operating at the current industry standard of 4 to 6 hours of discharge. By year-end, the number is projected to increase to 8,600 MW. Longer-duration storage, from 8 to 100 hours, can help the state transition away from fossil fuels and strengthen grid reliability. The state estimates more than 48 gigawatts (GW) of battery storage and 4 GW of long-duration storage will be needed to meet the goal of 100% clean electricity by 2045.

The other awards approved under the Long-Duration Energy Storage Program are:

  • $31 million for a 60 MW renewable backup power microgrid in San Diego County.

  • $32 million for a 20 MW microgrid project in Tehama County.

The grants are two of the largest the state has ever awarded to benefit California Native American tribes.

Comments

sd

Looks like a good idea if the economics work out. Certainly easy enough to get the raw materials. My question is about the efficiency. Lithium Ion has great efficiency but relatively high cost. Form Energy's web site does not mention the efficiency and Wikipedia did not have any information on Form Energy's iron air-cycle. Wikipedia had a different iron-air cycle that generated hydrogen and then used a fuel cell to make electricity.

Zyx

Not very efficient:
“Form is expecting a roundtrip efficiency of 45–50% ”
However, there are many factors for determining the Long Duration Energy Storage - Economics, Environmental concerns, Siting Issues, etc.
https://medium.com/@kitfitton/storing-renewable-electricity-on-the-grid-of-the-future-updated-for-2023-1816484dc9cd#:~:text=Form%20is%20expecting%20a%20roundtrip,be%20safer%20than%20lithium%2Dion.
Form Energy Whitepaper:
https://formenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Form_Energy_NYGasReplaceWhitePaper_V2.pdf

peskanov

There a few new contenders for this space, having higher efficiencies:
- CMBlue energy; organic solid/liquid
- Noon energy; co2 battery (electrochemical)
- Aquabattery; sodium chloride flow battery

yoatmon

It could be that the CEC is betting on the wrong horse. MIT's D. Sadoway, in cooperation with Peking University, developed an aluminum-sulfur-battery that is exempt from those problems that many other battery chemistries are prone to.
It employs abundant and cheap elements, endures high charging rates, has 526 watt-hours/liter and is cheap to manufacture.
https://pubs.aip.org/physicstoday/online/29728/An-aluminum-sulfur-battery-may-become-an

sd

@Gryf

Thanks again for the information. That is what I was afraid of -- low efficiency.

@Yoatman

If they can make aluminum-sulfur-batteries in production quantities and especially if they can hit the cost estimates and charge rates, the aluminum-sulfur-battery looks like a winner. When and if lithium-sulfur becomes practical, it might have an advantage advantage for aircraft and other applications where weight is a primary driver but aluminum and sulfur are certain abundant and relatively low cost materials.

The comments to this entry are closed.