JERA, NYK Line and Resonac launch joint study on supplying fuel ammonia to ships
NASA awards GE Aerospace contract for next phase of advanced engine compact core development

Oxylus Energy successfully validates catalyst and electrolyzer for direct conversion of CO2 to methanol

Oxylus Energy, the Yale-based start-up formerly known as Carbon Loop, has successfully passed key benchmark tests for the deployment and commercialization of its proprietary catalyst and electrolyzer technology in a 5cm2 cell. This is a critical platform for design iterations, as it offers significant predictability for performance at the size of commercial-scale cells.

No existing company has achieved the capability to convert captured carbon dioxide into methanol using an electrolyzer at room temperature & pressure at a production-level scale. Oxylus’ technology, however, holds the promise of being one of the most cost-effective methods for generating renewable methanol, potentially surpassing fossil-derived methanol.

By directly converting CO2 into methanol—avoiding the use of a second reactor to create hydrogen—Oxylus’ process saves costs and energy. Producing methanol as the only liquid end product also reduces separation and distillation expenses, making the entire process simpler and more cost-effective than other CO2 electrolysis methods, the company says.

With the successful validation of its 5cm2 platform, Oxylus is immediately prepared for the next phase of development, gearing up for tests at 10x scale before the end of the year. The upcoming trials will focus on the newly designed and constructed 50 cm2 cell and incorporate stability testing into the evaluation process.

This successful test confirms our capacity to generate renewable methanol on a platform that instills confidence in our ability to scale. The 5cm2 unit is the cornerstone of any electrolysis company as it has a high predictability for performance at the production scale. While diligently testing our 5cm2 electrolyzer, we simultaneously developed a larger 50cm2 counterpart to prove that we can develop larger electrolyzers that are firmly off the bench-scale.

Our sights are already set on the next significant step on our scale-up journey—a production-level cell. Major industries like the aviation and petrochemical industries need clean, renewable solutions now. We are not wasting any time.

—Perry Bakas, co-founder of Oxylus Energy

Although many metal coordination compounds catalyze CO2 electroreduction to CO, cobalt phthalocyanine hybridized with conductive carbon such as carbon nanotubes is currently the only one that can generate methanol (CH3OH). In October, in a paper published in Angewandte Chemie, researchers at Yale (including Oxylus co-founder Conor Rooney) and colleagues from Oregon State University, reported the first in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy characterizations, combined with ex situ spectroscopic and electrocatalytic measurements, to study CoPc-catalyzed CO2 reduction to methanol.

Resources

  • Conor L. Rooney, Mason Lyons, Yueshen Wu, Gongfang Hu, Maoyu Wang, Chungseok Choi, Yuanzuo Gao, Chun-Wai Chang, Gary W. Brudvig, Zhenxing Feng, Hailiang Wang (2023) “Active Sites of Cobalt Phthalocyanine in Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction to Methanol” Angewandte Chemie, doi: 10.1002/ange.202310623

Comments

Davemart

I had a quidk look around to see whether the materials used were impossibly expensive or rare, and if the authors were shy about what they were doing!

Neither appears to be the case,
On their website they specify what they are using:

https://oxylusenergy.com/

It seems that cobalt phthalocyanine is the critical element.

Checking that our here:

https://www.ossila.com/products/cobalt-phthalocyanine

We see that the formula is:

C32H16CoN8

So the only element at all questionable is cobalt, but that although a touch problematic is not at the level of cost and scarcity of platinum, for instance,

So I don't think this appears to be vapourware, at least at first blush

Roger Brown

Here is another company talking about a "circular" use of CO2, but who are in fact proposing only double use. That is they are proposing capturing CO2 from industrial emitters and converting it into methanol fuel. This process makes more efficient use of fossil carbon but does not stop the flow of that carbon into the atmosphere.

In order to achieve a circular economy you would need to use methanol (CH3OH) as a hydrogen carrier. A company called SAFCell (https://safcell.com/) proposes using solid acid fuel cells (SAFC) to decompose methanol into hydrogen and carbon dioxide via the reaction:

CH3OH + H2O ==> 3H2 + CO2

If you capture the CO2 and return it to the methanol production site you then have a circular economy.

Davemart

Not really Roger.

It does not have to be the same molecules of CO2, so long as the total quantities are the same as the global economy is using.

In practice they are looking at things like capturing the CO2 from methanol in shipping, pumping out and reconverting it to methanol, but at least in theory that does not have to happen.

And without economic direct air capture which is tough indeed to do, then it looks difficult to make the ledger balance, but a circular CO2 economy does not have to be perfectly leak proof with the same molecules 100 % reused,

Any old CO2 molecule from wherever will do.

SJC

I believe roger is right

Davemart

@SJC:

How is Roger right?
I really do not understand that, so please explain.

The comments to this entry are closed.