New ORNL process allows full recovery of starting materials from tough CFRP
09 February 2024
Researchers at the Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge National Laboratory have designed a closed-loop path for synthesizing an exceptionally tough carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) and later recovering all of its starting materials.
A lightweight, strong and tough composite material, CFRP is useful for reducing weight and increasing fuel efficiency of automobiles, airplanes and spacecraft. However, conventional CFRPs are difficult to recycle. Most have been single-use materials, so their carbon footprint is significant. By contrast, ORNL’s closed-loop technology, which is described in an open-access paper in Cell Reports Physical Science, accelerates addressing that grand challenge.
We incorporated dynamic crosslinking into a commodity polymer to functionalize it. Then, we added a crosslinker to make it like thermoset materials. Dynamic crosslinking allows us to break chemical bonds and reprocess or recycle the carbon fiber composite materials.
—Md Anisur Rahman, lead author
A conventional thermoset material is permanently crosslinked. Once synthesized, cured, molded and set into a shape, it cannot be reprocessed. ORNL’s system, on the other hand, adds dynamic chemical groups to the polymer matrix and its embedded carbon fibers. The polymer matrix and carbon fibers can undergo multiple reprocessing cycles without loss of mechanical properties, such as strength and toughness.
Rahman led the study with ORNL chemist Tomonori Saito, who was honored by Battelle in 2023 as ORNL Inventor of the Year. Rahman and ORNL postdoctoral fellow Menisha Karunarathna Koralalage conducted most of the experiments. The trio has applied for a patent for the innovation.
The interface locks materials together through covalent interactions and unlocks them on demand using heat or chemistry.
The fiber and the polymer have a very strong interfacial adhesion due to the presence of dynamic bonds. The functionalized fiber has dynamic exchangeable crosslinking with this polymer. The composite structure is really tough because of the interface characteristics. That makes a very, very strong material.
—Tomonori Saito
Conventional polymers such as thermoset epoxies are typically used to permanently bond materials such as metal, carbon, concrete, glass, ceramic and plastic to form multicomponent materials such as composites. However, in the ORNL material, the polymer, carbon fibers and crosslinker, once thermoset, can be reincarnated back into those starting materials. The material’s components can be released for recycling when a special alcohol called a pinacol replaces the crosslinker’s covalent bonds.
Closed-loop recycling at laboratory scale results in no loss of starting materials.
Other advantages of the reversibly crosslinked CFRPs are quick thermosetting, self-adhesive behavior and repair of microcracks in the composite matrix.
In the future, closed-loop recycling of CFRPs may transform low-carbon manufacturing as circular lightweight materials become incorporated into clean-energy technologies.
The researchers drew inspiration from nature, which employs dynamic interfaces to create robust materials. Nacre, the iridescent mother-of-pearl inside the shells of marine mussels and other mollusks, is exceptionally tough: it can deform without breaking. Moreover, marine mussels strongly adhere to surfaces but dissipate energy to release when necessary. The researchers aimed to optimize interfacial chemistry between the carbon fibers and the polymer matrix to boost interfacial adhesion and enhance CFRP toughness.
Our composite’s strength is almost two times higher than a conventional epoxy composite. Other mechanical properties are also very good.
—Md Anisur Rahman
The tensile strength was the highest ever reported among similar fiber-reinforced composite materials. It was 731 megapascals—stronger than stainless steel and stronger than a conventional epoxy-based CFRP composite for automobiles.
In the ORNL material, the dynamic covalent bonding between the fiber interface and the polymer had 43% greater interfacial adhesion compared to polymers without dynamic bonds.
The dynamic covalent bonds enable closed-loop recycling. In a conventional matrix material, the carbon fibers are difficult to separate from the polymer. ORNL’s chemical method, which clips fibers at the functional sites, makes it possible to separate fibers from the polymer for reuse.
Karunarathna Koralalage, Rahman and Saito modified a commodity polymer, called S-Bpin, with assistance from Natasha Ghezawi, a graduate student at the Bredesen Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Graduate Education of the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. They created upcycled styrene ethylene butylene styrene copolymer, which incorporates boronic ester groups that covalently bond with a crosslinker and fibers to generate the tough CFRP.
Because CFRP is a complex material, its detailed characterization required diverse expertise and instrumentation. ORNL’s Chris Bowland tested tensile properties. With Raman mapping, ORNL’s Guang Yang showed the distribution of chemical and structural species. Catalin Gainaru and Sungjin Kim, both of ORNL, captured rheological data, and Alexei Sokolov, a UT-ORNL Governor’s Chair, elucidated it. Scanning electron microscopy by Bingrui Li, of ORNL and UT, revealed that carbon fiber maintained its quality after recycling. Vivek Chawla and Dayakar Penumadu, both of UT, analyzed interlaminar shear strength. With X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, ORNL’s Harry Meyer III confirmed what molecules attached to fiber surfaces. ORNL’s Amit Naskar, a renowned expert in carbon fiber, reviewed the paper.
The scientists found that the degree of dynamic crosslinking is important.
We found 5% crosslinking works better than 50%. If we increase the crosslinker amount, it starts making the polymer brittle. That’s because our crosslinker has three hand-like bulky structures, able to make more connections and decrease the polymer’s flexibility.
—Md Anisur Rahman
Next, the research team would like to conduct similar studies with glass-fiber composites, which maintain high performance while lowering the cost and carbon footprint of applications in aerospace, automotive, marine, sporting, construction and engineering. They also hope to reduce costs of the new technology to optimize commercial prospects for a future licensee.
The Vehicle Technologies Office in DOE’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy sponsored the research. DOE’s Office of Electricity sponsored Raman mapping.
Resources
Md Anisur Rahman, Menisha S. Karunarathna, Christopher C. Bowland, Guang Yang, Catalin Gainaru, Bingrui Li, Sungjin Kim, Vivek Chawla, Natasha Ghezawi, Harry M. Meyer, Amit K. Naskar, Dayakar Penumadu, Alexei P. Sokolov, Tomonori Saito (2023) “Tough and recyclable carbon-fiber composites with exceptional interfacial adhesion via a tailored vitrimer-fiber interface,” Cell Reports Physical Science, Volume 4, Issue 12, doi: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2023.101695.
Should help to reduce the weight of what I respectfully refer to as fat-arsed design.
The move to ever wider and bigger cars has blown many of the gains of increasing degrees of electrification, overall.
A biggie for aircraft too, perhaps?
I like basalt fiber as cheaper than carbon fiber, more easily recyclable than glass fiber, and around as strong a S-glass, ie not so strong as carbon fiber, but stronger than glass fiber.
Posted by: Davemart | 09 February 2024 at 03:16 AM
As long a pinacol is both functionally distinct and unlikely to pop up in nature enough, it sounds great! Wikipedia says it is found in lemon grass, so as long as you don't plow off into a field of that, you should be safe from some unplanned molecular disassembly.
Posted by: Albert E Short | 09 February 2024 at 11:34 AM
can undergo multiple reprocessing cycles without loss of mechanical properties, such as strength and toughness....
This is an important point I'd like to be able to make other materials from it at end of life.
Posted by: SJC | 09 February 2024 at 09:28 PM
Hi SJC
I am assuming that you mean 'other products' not 'other materials' and that that is a typo?
This claims to be the Holy Grail, where you can reprocess the material and come out with exactly the same strength and specifications, staggering if so.
At the moment for instance aluminium air frame bodies are near 100% recycled, which sounds wonderful until you note that they are recycled into drink cans, not new aircraft bodies.
And Rosie, in one of the few instances where I would take issue with her, had a recent article in 'Engineering with Rosie' where she was arguing in favour of allowing wind turbine blades to be simply used as landfill, although in Europe and many states in the US there is simply not the space in landfill to allow that as any sort of lousy 'solution' Best case at the moment is something like using them as rebar in concrete.
I also argued there that basalt fiber appears to have superior recycling capabilities to glass fiber, with strength somewhere around that of S-glass, ie better than fiber glass, although less than the more expensive carbon fiber.
The likes of Windelo are using it in their yachts, as especially for marine uses it has excellent qualities.
But this claim is on another level, so that potentially everything from air frames to wind turbines to car bodies could be reprocessed indefinitely.
Too good to be true? I await confimation, or refutation.
But there would appear to be the potential to move in a substantial way towards a circular economy.
Posted by: Davemart | 10 February 2024 at 01:31 AM