Tohoku team identifies promising approach to electrocatalytic production of ammonia
24 March 2024
Researchers from Tohoku University have identified a promising alternative to the conventional means of synthesizing ammonia, one that is more environmentally friendly. Details of their research are published in an open-access paper in the Journal of Materials Chemistry A.
The Haber-Bosch synthesis, developed in the early 20th century to synthesize ammonia from nitrogen and hydrogen gas remains the dominant means of producing ammonia. However, the process is energy- and resource-intensive, and producing hydrogen gas often involves natural gas, which releases carbon dioxide as a by-product.
The electrochemical nitrogen reduction reaction (ENRR), where nitrogen gas from the air can be converted into ammonia using an electrical current, is seen as a promising and sustainable alternative. Pursuing high-performance and cost-effective ENRR catalysts, however, is an open challenge for achieving commercial-scale ambient ammonia production.
We explored the potential of less-precious transition metal disulfides (TMS2) as catalysts for ENRR. Through meticulous analysis of electrochemistry-induced surface states, we uncovered a previously unrecognized factor contributing to their high ENRR performance: S-vacancy generation.
—Hao Li, corresponding author
Li and his colleagues started with a typical ENRR TMS2 catalyst—iron disulfide (FeS2). They observed that under ENRR conditions, S-vacancies can be easily generated on the catalyst surface. Through advanced computational simulations, they demonstrated that this electrochemistry-driven in situ generation of S-vacancies significantly enhances ENRR activity by promoting stronger N-N adsorption and activation.
Experimental observations confirmed their findings, which were also consistent with recent literature on ENRR potential windows reaching maximum Faradaic efficiency—the measure of the effectiveness of an electrochemical process in converting electrical energy into chemical energy or vice versa.
(a) 1D and (b) 2D surface Pourbaix diagrams of FeS2(111) considering different coverages of SV, O*, H*, and HO*. The experimental potentials at the highest faradaic efficiencies of reported FeS2-based catalysts are plotted for a direct comparison. ©Hao Li et al.
Their analysis also extended to other TMS2 catalysts (SnS2, MoS2, NiS2, and VS2), revealing a universal phenomenon of in situ S-vacancy generation under ENRR potentials.
Our research underscores the critical importance of considering surface states in the design of ENRR catalysts. By shedding light on the role of S-vacancies, we have provided a valuable roadmap for enhancing ENRR performance and accelerating the transition towards sustainable ammonia production.
—Hao Li
(a) 1D surface Pourbaix diagrams of different transition metal disulfide (TMS2) surfaces. (b) 2D surface Pourbaix diagram of SV formation as a function of pH and potential. The color-coded segments demarcate the potential windows of SV generation on the respective instances of TMS2. ©Hao Li et al.
This work was supported by AIMR Fusion Research and also received substantial support for the JSPS Postdoctoral Fellowship for Dr. Tianyi Wang in the Hao Li Lab.
Resources
Tianyi Wang, Zhongyuan Guo, Hirofumi Oka, Akichika Kumatani, Chuangwei Liu, and Hao Li (2024) “Origin of electrocatalytic nitrogen reduction activity over transition metal disulfides: critical role of in situ generation of S vacancy” Journal of Materials Chemistry A doi: 10.1039/D4TA00307A
I am not sure how this correlates with what Nitricity are up to, who have demonstrations running for nitrogen fertiliser production on the farm:
https://www.nitricity.co/renewable-nitrogen-fertilizer-pioneer
That obviates the substantial transport and distribution costs of fertilisers for a start.
Posted by: Davemart | 24 March 2024 at 02:52 AM
Making ammonia takes a lot of energy and emits a lot of carbon dioxide
people don't consider this when they advocate using ammonia for a fuel.
Posted by: SJC | 24 March 2024 at 06:44 AM
Hi SJC
Dunno how effective they are, but the idea of these new techs in ammonia production is that they emit way less energy and GHG than has happened with existing tech.
I'm far from convinced, but not prepared to totally dismiss them at present.
Certainly though and much more credibly it looks as though it is possible to take great chunks out of emissions for fertiliser production.
Posted by: Davemart | 24 March 2024 at 01:42 PM
To use one of your own responses it's not widely used thus it's not viable.
Posted by: SJC | 24 March 2024 at 02:31 PM
@SJC
Nope, you are talking out of your hat. I have never made such a response, although of course until it is widely used viability is not fully proven at volume.
If you wish to attribute negative stuff to me, have the manners to provide the links and the exact quote.
Do learn what a quote is, and how to do them responsibly.
Posted by: Davemart | 24 March 2024 at 02:50 PM
Oh please get a life!
Posted by: SJC | 24 March 2024 at 05:43 PM
@SJC
Why you should think your wilful ill manners appropriate is mysterious.
You have claimed that I have said stuff, and now can't back it up.
No doubt on many occasions like the rest of us I have been mistaken in attempting to assess what is going on, but do my level best to be even handed and when mistaken retract.
Posted by: Davemart | 25 March 2024 at 02:11 AM