LiquidPiston achieves key milestone for US Army Development Program’s 25hp rotary engine
ArcelorMittal expands Multi Part Integration (MPI) to Japan through partial ablation technology agreement with G-Tekt

ARPA-E ROSIE program announces $28M for 13 projects to decarbonize domestic iron and steel production

The US Department of Energy (DOE) announced $28 million in funding to 13 projects across 9 states to advance zero-process-emission ironmaking and ultra-low life cycle emissions steelmaking. The technologies funded through this program would be the first to meet both emissions and cost-parity goals.

The teams will be managed by DOE’s Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) under the Revolutionizing Ore to Steel to Impact Emissions (ROSIE) program (earlier post).

The iron and steel industry accounts for approximately 7% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and 11% of global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. By 2050, global iron and steel demand is projected to rise as much as 40%. This projected growth underscores the importance of lowering emissions from this industry. Current blast furnace technologies—responsible for approximately 70% of global iron and steel GHG emissions—require carbon for heat, chemistry, and structure, making the process particularly difficult to decarbonize.

The ROSIE projects selected today seek to revolutionize not just the iron or steelmaking process, but the entire supply chain from ore to final steel production. The following teams will work to develop and demonstrate novel technologies that produce iron-based products from iron-containing ores and alternative feedstocks without process emissions in the ironmaking step:

  • Argonne National Laboratory will further develop a microwave-powered hydrogen plasma rotary kiln process for reducing iron ore that would eliminate carbon dioxide emissions from the ironmaking process. Argonne’s method has the potential to reduce carbon dioxide emissions arising from ironmaking by 35% compared to the blast furnace process when using today’s grid and by 88% when using a future low-carbon grid, while also reducing the cost of making hot rolled steel. (Award amount: $3,066,221)

  • Blue Origin will use an “Ouroboros” system that produces high-purity ferro-silicate pig iron from low-quality iron ores using molten oxide electrolysis (MOE) with zero direct process greenhouse gas emissions. Blue Origin will leverage and transfer the MOE expertise developed for lunar applications toward novel, terrestrial iron making approaches. The approach could reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the terrestrial ironmaking industry and clean up mine tailing storage facilities across the country. (Award amount: $1,109,422)

  • Electra will develop a process for producing iron at the temperature of a cup of coffee using unconventional feedstocks and a process involving two electrochemical cell stacks. If successful, the project will produce iron for use in green steel with 80% less greenhouse gas emissions at half the cost of existing traditional fuel-based processes. (Award amount: $2,874,596)

  • Form Energy will leverage its patent-pending breakthrough to directly produce iron powders from alkaline iron ore slurries in a first-of-a-kind powder-to-powder process. Using domestically available iron ore feedstocks, the process has the potential to produce greenhouse gas emission-free iron at cost parity with today’s carbon-intensive ironmaking methods. (Award amount: $1,000,000)

  • Georgia Institute of Technology will work on a method to produce net-shaped engineered lattice structures and cellular structures of alloy steels by solid-state direct reduction of extruded structures. Several potential markets for the use of structural steels—where lightweighting and stiffness are most highly valued—include aerospace, military, and civilian aircraft, as well as automotive structural components. (Award amount: $2,843,274)

  • Limelight Steel will convert iron ore into iron metal using a laser furnace without emitting carbon dioxide at lower cost than a blast furnace. The process leverages semiconductor laser diodes, which enable new temperature and pressure ranges to reduce high- and low-grade iron ore fines into molten iron metal. Limelight estimates that their technology would reduce energy consumption of steelmaking by 46% and emissions by 81%. (Award amount: $2,910,346)

  • Pennsylvania State University will develop an efficient, productive, and reliable electrochemical process for the economical reduction of iron ore at temperatures below 600°C without direct greenhouse gas emissions. The approach of a metallic anode protected by a solid metal oxide would overcome many of the challenges of anodic degradation that have hindered historical progress in this area. A host of electrolytes will be investigated while processing mixed Fe(II) and Fe(III) ores and simultaneously addressing ore impurities. (Award amount: $760,000)

  • Phoenix Tailings will utilize an ore-to-iron production process using the arc generated from an air-gapped electrode to electrolyze the molten oxide electrolyte powered by clean electricity. Molten oxide electrolysis is a promising alternative to conventional approaches, but until now has required anode materials that are either consumable or prohibitively expensive. (Award amount: $1,000,000)

  • Tufts University will develop a method to directly reduce iron ore concentrates with ammonia, eliminating all direct process emissions from the ironmaking step, as well as emissions that result from baking iron ore with clay to make hard pellets. By using low-grade ores, bypassing the pellet-hardening step, and lowering melting costs, this new approach to ammonia-based reduction would reduce the cost of domestic steel while decreasing total steel emissions by greater than 60%. (Award amount: $2,924,514)

  • University of Minnesota will work on a fully electrified microwave hydrogen plasma process to replace blast furnace technology. The technology will use blast furnace and direct reduction grade iron ore concentrates, eliminating the emissions associated with the pelletization, sintering, and coke-making steps in the conventional blast furnace process. (Award amount: $2,820,071)

  • University of Nevada will develop technology to use electrowinning to convert pulverized iron ore into pure iron that is deposited on a cathode. The goal is to create a laboratory-scale prototype of an impeller-accelerated reactor that maintains the production of one kilogram per hour of over 95% pure iron for 100 hours. (Award amount: $2,102,353)

  • University of Utah will advance a hydrogen-reduction melt-less steelmaking technology. The proposed process has the potential to drastically reduce energy consumption by eliminating several high-energy steps in traditional iron and steelmaking and is conducted at substantially lower temperatures than conventional methods. This approach is projected to decrease energy use by at least 50% in the production of steel mill products and up to 90% in creating near-net-shape steel components. (Award amount: $3,479,082)

  • Worcester Polytechnic Institute will focus on manufacturing technologies for low carbon electrolyzed iron powder to be used in iron-silicon electrical steel. The work could revolutionize iron production by replacing the traditional carbothermic process while significantly reducing energy usage, greenhouse gas emissions, and cost. (Award amount: $1,241,919)

Comments

Davemart

Like most folk I was pretty excited about the possibility of direct reduction to produce steel, eliminating the need to use hydrogen, which whilst it certainly works is for the moment at least more expensive, and is yet another demand on our green hydrogen production, which is currently limited.

But this concerns me:

https://thundersaidenergy.com/downloads/boston-metal-molten-oxide-electrolysis-of-steel/

' The key challenge for MOE of iron ore is temperature. From our patent review, we could not identify any clear candidate solvents, which would materially lower the melting point needed for electrolysis of iron oxide. Boston Metal also alludes to its cells running at 1,600C, which is near the melting point of iron/iron ore.

What materials could serve as current collectors for these cells? Most conductive metals, and even most super-alloys, have melted by 1,500C. There are refractory ceramics that tolerate temperatures around 2,500C, but they are not conductive. There are refractory metals that tolerate these high temperatures, but they have higher redox potentials than iron, meaning they would oxidize and cease to be conductive? Likewise, graphite has a very high melting point, but is prone to oxidizing into CO2 at such high temperatures.'

This is fundamental stuff, not simply incremental improvement.

Lovely, if we can do it.
That does not make it a plan, which has to show clear known means to an end.

Davemart

The other approach to not emitting so much GHG in steelmaking is not to use so much of it.

Is this possible without destroying the economy?

I think it may be by materials substitution.

To my surprise when I had a look into it I found that 367 million tons of annual production of steel is for rebar to reinforce concrete, being a very large component of the GHG for it:

https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/steel-rebar-market

It seems that basalt fiber may be an excellent candidate to replace this in many uses.

https://www.monolithic.org/link-to/basalt-fiber-rebar

' Basalt rebar clearly is ready to be used as a substitute for both steel and fiberglass rebar. It is still somewhat more expensive than steel, so it is first being used where steel has disadvantages. It can quickly replace stainless steel and epoxy-coated steel on a cost basis when regulatory hurdles are cleared. As its cost comes down with production volume, it has a chance to replace steel rebar more generally.The fact that it is not corrosive gives it a great advantage over steel.'

https://www.greenbuildingadvisor.com/article/basalt-rebar

' According to Tingberg, basalt-based rebar has less than 1/10 the carbon footprint of steel, and basalt has the lowest environmental impact in a Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) compared with other FRP (Fiber Reinforced Polymer) rebars, including those made with glass fiber.'

The lifespan of structures using basalt fiber should also be much longer:
https://arabbasaltfiber.com/the-lifespan-of-bfrp-rebar-en/

'

BFRP Rebar does not rust, it has the same thermal expansion coefficient as concrete, it is resistant to water, alkaline, and ultraviolet radiation, therefore it can have a life expectancy of more than 100 years!

Steel, on the other hand, is prone to rust and corrosion, especially where moisture is present; it is also prone to cracking due to its different coefficient of thermal expansion compared to concrete, causing buildings to require frequent maintenance, so according to general standards, steel has an average lifespan of 35 years.'


The comments to this entry are closed.