ARPA-E announces $40M to develop technologies to alleviate the impact of used nuclear fuel storage
DOE releases vision for beneficially integrating EVs into the grid

EPA awarding nearly $160M to support clean US manufacturing of steel and other construction materials

The US Environmental Protection Agency announced the selection of 38 grant recipients across the country, totaling nearly $160 million, to support efforts to report and reduce climate pollution from the manufacturing of construction materials and products. EPA estimates that the construction materials used in buildings and other built infrastructure account for more than 15% of annual global greenhouse gas emissions.

The grants will be awarded to businesses, universities and nonprofit organizations serving all 50 states and will help disclose the environmental impacts associated with manufacturing concrete, asphalt, glass, steel, wood and other materials.

Ranging from $250,000 to $10 million, the grants will help businesses develop robust, high-quality environmental product declarations (EPDs), which show environmental impacts across the life of a product and can catalyze more sustainable purchasing decisions by allowing buyers to compare products.

Investments in data and tools will make high-quality EPDs available for 14 material categories, which include both new and salvaged or reused materials. These efforts will help standardize and expand the market for construction products with lower greenhouse gas emissions. They will make it easier for federal, state and local governments and other institutional buyers to ensure the construction projects they fund use more climate-friendly products and materials.

EPA is also announcing expanded technical assistance opportunities to businesses, the federal government and other organizations across America. EPA will initially offer EPD development support and direct businesses to resources to help them measure and reduce the embodied carbon associated with their materials, such as those provided by the ENERGY STAR Industrial program. Federal agencies and their suppliers will be able to compare the climate impact of various materials to drive near-term greenhouse gas emissions reductions. EPD data will be further strengthened by a new label program under development that will identify low carbon construction materials for the growing Buy Clean marketplace.

Comments

Davemart

I was having a discussion with sd the other day, and referenced this article here:

https://www.greencarcongress.com/2024/07/20240716-constelliumh2.html

' This casting was performed in a 12-ton furnace following strict internal procedures. Quality monitoring, including the use of Batscan technology, an inclusion detection tool for molten aluminum, was conducted and no quality impact from hydrogen combustion on metal was observed.'

I said that this seemed to show that aluminum production as well as steel could largely be decarbonised by the use of hydrogen, instead of the present coal, NG etc

sd raised the very valid point that this seemed to be about later processing of aluminum, not its initial production.

Now even then, aluminum has a high recycling rate, so hydrogen would be very handy for that.

I have now had a chance to find out a bit more about the initial process of making aluminum from bauxite:

https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/metals-and-mining/our-insights/aluminum-decarbonization-at-a-cost-that-makes-sense

' While the metal itself is sustainable, its production usually is not. Although abundant in the Earth’s soil and rocks, aluminum does not occur in its pure form and has to be extracted from compounds—a complicated process of refining and smelting that requires a large and constant load of electricity. To produce this energy, many countries rely on coal. Globally, about 55 percent of the electricity needed for aluminum smelters comes from coal-fired power plants (with 10 percent from natural-gas plants and 30 percent from hydropower).3 As a result, the aluminum industry is among the highest-emitting sectors in the world, accounting for about 2 percent of global greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions.4'

And:

' Roughly 80 percent of primary aluminum GHG emissions are generated from smelting, of which 81 percent are associated with the electricity used for electrolysis.6 For aluminum smelters that have opted to supply this energy from their own power plants, as opposed to obtaining energy from the grid, solar or wind generation can be a useful addition. But due to their intermittency, these renewable sources won’t be able to fully power the process.'

And

'More widely applicable alternatives that could reduce nearly all thermal refining emissions are electric boilers powered by either wind or solar,9 hydrogen boilers supplied with green hydrogen, or boilers that employ MVR technology, an energy recovery process that can be used to recycle waste heat.10'

MVR:

'Mechanical Vapor Recompression (MVR) is a proven energy-saving evaporative concentration technology, which reduces evaporation energy use by 90% or more. MVR Thermodynamic Cycle. MVR uses energy recovered from the condensate to create a pure liquid distillate and a concentrated product/waste.'

So it is complex and challenging, and would use a variety of technologies, including hydrogen, but can be done.

The biggest producer of bauxite is Austalia, which also of course has massive renewables resources.

And of course much of the world's iron comes from there, which is currently largely made into steel in China.

Others have argued elsewhere that instead of concentrating on exporting hydrogen, which is tough to do, Australia should simply concentrate on repatriating steel production using their renewably produced hydrogen, an perhaps the same can be done for aluminum production.

The comments to this entry are closed.