Daimler Truck starts initial customer trials with five Mercedes-Benz GenH2 trucks
ZF Group to cut 11,000 to 14,000 workers by 2028; restructuring focused on Electrified Powertrain Technologies division.

Natura partners with Texas Produced Water Consortium to look at deployment of molten salt reactor

Natura Resources, LLC (Natura) is partnering with the Texas Produced Water Consortium (TxPWC) at Texas Tech University to look at the deployment of Natura’s liquid-fueled molten salt reactor (LF-MSR) technology to power the Permian Basin.

Dubbed “Fortifying the Future,” this partnership provides an opportunity to deploy Natura’s LF-MSR technology to provide additional sources of reliable, dispatchable energy paired with produced water treatment facilities to supply two new forms of critical resources for the state of Texas.

Natura Resources is leading in the development and deployment of LF-MSR technology.The Fortifying the Future partnership with the TPWC and the upcoming construction permit issuance in September for Natura’s first reactor deployment at Abilene Christian University are both evidence of the rapid pace at which Natura is developing LF-MSR technology, the company said.

The TPWC was created by the Texas Legislature in 2021 as the state’s premier produced water research consortium focused on the potential for beneficial uses of treated produced water outside the oil and gas industry. The consortium is specifically tasked with providing the Legislature and state agencies guidance and recommendations on policies that could encourage a system of beneficial use that is both environmentally safe and economically viable.

Affordable, reliable energy is a critical component of the economics of any water treatment process. Having access to a commercialized molten salt reactor in remote areas of the state could prove to be not only a major breakthrough in achieving economic feasibility for treating new sources of water but also could serve as another critical component in supplying Texans with additional electric generation capacity at a crucial time in the state’s history, Natura said.

A Liquid-Fueled Molten Salt Reactor (LF-MSR) is a type of advanced reactor that uses liquid fuel in the form of molten salts for both the fuel and the coolant. The most commonly discussed molten salt for this application is a mixture of lithium fluoride (LiF) and beryllium fluoride (BeF2) salts, and/or thorium fluoride salts. LF-MSRs operate at high temperatures and have unique features that differentiate them from traditional solid-fuel reactors.

In liquid-fuel MSR designs, the fission products dissolve in the fuel salt and are ideally removed continuously in an adjacent online reprocessing loop and replaced with fissile uranium, plutonium and other actinides or, potentially, fertile Th-232 or U-238.

Liquid fuel eliminates the possibility of a meltdown making MSRs “walk away safe.” If a malfunction occurs, the fuel salt cools, turns into a solid, and is safely contained within the system. They are also far more efficient, targeting greater than 90% burnup of the fuel as opposed to the less than 5% consumption rate of current solid fuel reactors.

Cooling nuclear reactors with molten salt instead of water allows operation at the pressure of household pipes as well as operation at significantly higher temperatures than conventional reactors, creating an opportunity to serve industries that require 24/7 sources of pow

Comments

Davemart

In other nuclear news China has tested its HTPBR for a total loss of coolant, a la Fukushima:

https://newatlas.com/energy/meltdown-proof-nuclear-reactor-first-safety-tests-china/

' The system isn't a new one. It's based on the German AVR power plant that ran for 21 years and did the same safety test as at the China reactor, except that the former was an experimental reactor, while the one at Shidao Bay is the world's first commercial pebble-bed reactor. In both tests, the power was shut off while the cores ran and the passive safety features took over.

In the Shidao Bay test, two pebble-bed reactors connected to a 210-MWe steam turbine moderated their own nuclear reactions and safe temperatures were maintained, with the core shutting down in minutes. Both reaction and temperature stabilized in about 35 hours. In addition, there was no deterioration of the nuclear fuel.'

200MW-ish is a handy size, as you don't need to transport power long distances, and can put them in proximity to where they are needed.

Being nuclear of course it is 24/7, and being high temperature turns out hydrogen too with excellent efficiency, which is exactly how the Chinese plan to use it.

It is of course based on German technology, before they decided that the risk of a tsunami in the Rhine was so high that they needed to abandon perfectly working reactors, as they could rely on natural gas from Russia.

dursun

LOL, the biggest danger of nuclear is financial

Lazard's Levelized Cost of Energy Analysis

Davemart

In China and a lot of other places the cost of nuclear, which mainly consists of build costs with running costs negligible, is way, way lower than in the West.

No industry could be profitable under a regulatory regime like nuclear in the west, perpetually changing mid build.

China has announced its intention to build these reactors not only at home but in other places where the anti-nuclear lobby has not taken over, in series, where industrial process heat as well as power is needed.

Believe it or not, it is handy to have high temperature heat as well as power available 24/7

sd

Could not find much information on their website such as the size in power, etc. Another wait and see project but the concept looks interesting.

The comments to this entry are closed.