Wright awarded $3.3M from FAA for ultra-high-energy battery project
Next Hydrogen to supply electrolysis technology for renewable energy ammonia production research

Unither Bioelectronics partners with Robinson Helicopter Company to develop hydrogen helicopter

Unither Bioelectronics Inc. (UB), a subsidiary of United Therapeutics Corporation, and Robinson Helicopter Company have entered into a collaboration agreement to accelerate UB’s development of hydrogen-powered helicopters based on Robinson’s popular R44 and R66 helicopter models. This strategic collaboration is expected to accelerate the development of zero-emission helicopters and increase the likelihood of regulatory approval.

Under the terms of the agreement, Robinson will provide its extensive engineering, technical, and regulatory expertise to help streamline the development and certification of these hydrogen-electric helicopters with the goal of obtaining certification from Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

This collaboration accelerates the development of sustainable transportation solutions for life-saving organs. Hydrogen-powered aircraft are the next frontier in sustainable aviation. We are committed to developing a zero-operational carbon emission fleet of aircraft, and we look forward to working with the expert team at Robinson Helicopter to enable regulatory approval and production of these aircraft.

—Mikael Cardinal, Vice President of Program Management and Organ Delivery Systems and Head of the United Therapeutics Organ Delivery Systems (UTODS) development program

Headquartered in Bromont, Québec, UB seeks to redefine how organs are transported for transplant via the UTODS. Currently under development, the UTODS is intended to serve as a highly efficient and environmentally friendly transportation system capable of delivering manufactured organs from United Therapeutics’ facilities to transplant centers across North America.

Under the UTODS program, UB is developing next-generation electric- and hydrogen-powered, optionally piloted vertical lift aircraft capable of operating from existing hospital air-transport infrastructure.

UB intends to develop and operate a fleet of next-generation, electric- and hydrogen-powered, optionally piloted, and powered-lift aircraft with the capacity to take off and land vertically at hospitals—capable of quickly delivering manufactured organs for human transplant.

Comments

Davemart

The good thing is that we know helicopters work.

Obviously putting in a fuel will more bulk but higher energy density by weight into vehicles designed for kerosene will be sub optimal, but we can decarbonise with it and fancy designs can come later.

Roger Pham

Fuel cell can almost double the thermal efficiency of combustion engine, while Liquid H2 has 1/3 the weight of gasoline, and with doubling the efficiency, the LH2 fuel will weigh 1/6 the weight of gasoline. LH2 can be stored in very light-weight aluminum container insulated by feather-weight polyurethane foam, so payload will nearly double, assuming that FC-e-motor powertrain will not weigh more than the existing piston engine currently in use.

So, LH2 will be very desirable for aviation just from the standpoint of payload gain and efficiency alone. The LH2 can be produced right at the aeroport from uderground H2 piping system and liquefied right at the point of consumption.

SJC

It might be good to have a hybrid helicopter in case the turbine gives out or you run out of fuel or any other issue you'd have an electric motor with some lipo batteries to bring it down auto rotate is a bit problematic

Roger Pham

Good point, SJC.
One advantage of FC and E-motor is that they can be modular, of any sizes, and still retain the thermal efficiency, and cost effectiveness, unlike a gas turbine which loses a lot of efficiency in smaller sizes and cost more as well when having multiple turbines of smaller sizes, and a piston engine as well, which is not well balanced with fewer cylinders and costs more per hp with higher cylinder count. That's why we now see only twin engine jumbo jets, instead of 3-4-engine jets of yesteryear's. The engine count is reduced to improve efficiency and lower cost.

So, instead of having a single engine like in most small helicopters and private planes, you could have two or even 3 sets of FC, E-motor, and inverter, each running separately for backing up each other. You could also have 2-3 fuel tanks as well, in case 1 is leaking. With 3 separate power systems, if one should fail, you would still have 2 other running to provide 66% of maximum power, and will likely allow you to get to destination safely. This is better than a twin-engine plane or helicopter in which if 1 engine fail, you only have 50% power remaining, thus making continuation of the trip rather dicey, especially on a long-distance flight over inhospitable terrain and/or climate,

The harsh reality is that engine failures in single-engine airplanes regularly kill many people every year, and increasingly so due to more and more housing developments around small airports, thus leaving no place for ditching nor any room for miscalculation should engine failure occur.
So, with the eventual development of FC tech for general aviation, the FAA should BAN all single-engine airplanes and helicopters, because they are accidents waiting to happen and public hazard.

SJC

Fine minds think alike Roger, always a good conversation with you.

The comments to this entry are closed.