Researchers develop new sheet-type sulfide solid-state electrolyte that could double energy storage to ~500 Wh/kg
30 August 2024
Researchers at Oak Ridge National Laboratory have developed a thin, flexible, solid-state electrolyte (SSE) that may double energy storage for next-gen electric vehicles, cell phones, laptops and other devices. The sheets may allow scalable production of future solid-state batteries with higher energy density electrodes.
The work, published in ACS Energy Letters, improved on a prior ORNL invention by optimizing the polymer binder for use with sulfide solid-state electrolytes. It is part of ongoing efforts that establish protocols for selecting and processing materials.
Our achievement could at least double energy storage to 500 watt-hours per kilogram. The major motivation to develop solid-state electrolyte membranes that are 30 micrometers or thinner was to pack more energy into lithium-ion batteries so your electric vehicles, laptops and cell phones can run much longer before needing to recharge.
—Guang Yang, co-corresponding author
The goal of this study was to find the “Goldilocks” spot—a film thickness just right for supporting both ion conduction and structural strength.
Current solid-state electrolytes use a plastic polymer that conducts ions, but their conductivity is much lower than that of liquid electrolytes. Sometimes, polymer electrolytes incorporate liquid electrolytes to improve performance.
Sulfide solid-state electrolyte has ionic conductivity comparable to that of the liquid electrolyte currently used in lithium-ion batteries.
It’s very appealing,. The sulfide compounds create a conducting path that allows lithium to move back and forth during the charge/discharge process.
—Guang Yang
The researchers discovered that the polymer binder’s molecular weight is crucial for creating durable solid-state-electrolyte films. Films made with lightweight binders, which have shorter polymer chains, lack the strength to stay in contact with the electrolytic material. By contrast, films made with heavier binders, which have longer polymer chains, have greater structural integrity. Additionally, it takes less long-chain binder to make a good ion-conducting film.
We want to minimize the polymer binder because it does not conduct ions. The binder’s only function is to lock the electrolyte particles into the film. Using more binder improves the film’s quality but reduces ion conduction. Conversely, using less binder enhances ion conduction but compromises film quality.
—Guang Yang
Yang designed the study’s experiments and oversaw the project, collaborating with Jagjit Nanda, the executive director of the SLAC Stanford Battery Center and a Battelle Distinguished Inventor. Yang was recently recognized by DOE’s Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy as a scientist likely to succeed in converting innovative ideas into impactful technologies.
Anna Mills, a former graduate student at Florida A&M University-Florida State University College of Engineering, focused on nanomaterial synthesis. She tested thin films using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and made critical current density measurements. Daniel Hallinan from Florida State provided advice on polymer physics. Ella Williams, a summer intern from Freed-Hardeman University, helped with electrochemical cell fabrication and evaluations.
At the Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, a DOE Office of Science user facility at ORNL, Yi-Feng Su and Wan-Yu Tsai conducted scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy to characterize the elemental composition and microscopic structure of the thin film. Sergiy Kalnaus, also from ORNL, used nanoindentation to measure local stress and strain on its surface and applied theory to understand the results.
Xueli Zheng and Swetha Vaidyanathan, both of SLAC National Acceleratory Laboratory, performed measurements at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource to reveal the morphology of cathode particles.
These advanced characterization techniques were crucial for examining the intricate details of the sulfide solid-state electrolyte sheet.
By understanding these details, we were able to enhance the electrolyte’s ability to conduct ions effectively and maintain its stability. This detailed analysis is vital for developing more reliable and efficient solid-state batteries.
—Guang Yang
The scientists are expanding the capabilities of their 7,000 square feet of ORNL lab space by establishing low-humidity areas dedicated for research with sulfides, which tend to contaminate other materials.
The team will build a device that can integrate a thin film into next-generation negative and positive electrodes to test it under practical battery conditions. Then they will partner with researchers in industry, academia and government to develop and test the film in other devices.
This research was sponsored by the DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy’s Vehicle Technologies Office.
Resources
Elucidating Polymer Binder Entanglement in Freestanding Sulfide Solid-State Electrolyte Membranes; Anna Mills, Sergiy Kalnaus, Wan-Yu Tsai, Yi-Feng Su, Ella Williams, Xueli Zheng, Swetha Vaidyanathan, Daniel T. Hallinan Jr., Jagjit Nanda, and Guang Yang; ACS Energy Letters 2024 9 (6), 2677-2684 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c02813
Batteries consume electricity and there is already electricity shortages almost everywhere, except in china where there is plentiful coal power plant build weekly.
The way to go is cheap efuels to get rid of costly petroleum and toxic batteries. And we can use efuels and gas when there is a blackout.
Posted by: Gorr | 30 August 2024 at 05:02 AM
Gorr,
you tell us how to produce cheap efuels at global scale. Good luck with that!
Posted by: peskanov | 30 August 2024 at 08:47 AM
If we can get chiep solid state sodium batteries, evs canbe chieper then petrol cars.
Posted by: Nirmalkumar | 30 August 2024 at 07:01 PM
And here is a tech for using graphene to replace copper and aluminum in current collectors in batteries:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/08/240829131649.htm
We seem to be ( finally! ) getting there, for high energy density long lasting batteries, I would guess in volume production before 2030.
See this recent article here for an initial fast charge greatly increasing lifespan:
https://www.greencarcongress.com/2024/08/20240830-slac.html
And I would also mention the big stumbling block we have for 100% renewables in the grid, the problem of overnight storage, as present lithium batteries can only manage around 2-4 hours backup at any reasonable cost, so if you want to switch on in a predominantly solar powered grid overnight, you may be unlucky:
https://enervenue.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Enervenue_Battery_Score_Sheet_Overbuild.pdf
This nickel hydrogen energy storage system ( stationary only, way too heavy for cars etc!) can manage 12 hours, although the costings seem to focus on 2 charges or so per day, and it is unclear at least to me how good the economics are for just charging up during the day for use overnight. If we crack that, we are most of the way there for most of the people in the world
The remaining issue is long duration low renewables, only really applicable for people who live in far northern latitudes like Germany, where you can have very low power for a week or so.
Some form of chemical storage is needed for that, but it represents a comparatively small amount of total energy use over the year.
It can be done by for instance hydrogen storage in salt caverns, depleted gas wells etc, certainly in the cases of the UK and Germany and many areas of the US, but it is dependent on local geology.
Answers are coming into view though, and this progress in batteries is great news!
Posted by: Davemart | 31 August 2024 at 02:38 AM
With graphene and sulfide we might be able to produce a pretty interesting battery, you wouldn't need copper, aluminum or any of the solvents that cause problems in the electrolyte. It would be solid state, charge quickly and have good energy density. For the next trick you have to find a way to make graphene really inexpensively... stay tuned
Posted by: SJC | 31 August 2024 at 01:00 PM
@SJC
Good catch!
Prices for graphene are all over the shop, but the high purity stuff which is presumably what is needed are apparently still priced as unobtainium!
Several zeros need to come off the cost.....
Posted by: Davemart | 01 September 2024 at 03:31 AM
I looked up low cost graphene on the web it said you just need a sheet of copper some methane some heat that sounded a bit too simple
Posted by: SJC | 01 September 2024 at 01:50 PM
Hi SJC
Here is what I dug up on graphene pricing after your interesting comment:
https://www.batterytechonline.com/market-analysis/ai-analyses-of-battery-tech-call-graphene-batteries-as-disruptive-
' But Focus states that to make these batteries a reality, the production cost of graphene needs to decrease significantly. High-quality graphene costs $200,000 per ton, equivalent to $200 per kilo. A reasonable assumption is that for graphene to be attractive for battery incorporation, its price needs to reach levels similar to lithium, which is currently at $16 per kilo and expected to drop to around $11 per kilo. Focus's forecasting method indicates a 36.5% YoY improvement in graphene production. With this projection, it's anticipated that by about 2031, graphene production will become cost-effective enough to be integrated into battery chemistries, making it a technology worth monitoring closely.'
Posted by: Davemart | 02 September 2024 at 04:23 AM
If we pyrolyze natural gas at point of use to get hydrogen you get carbon that carbon can be used to make graphene you get the heat for the pyrolysis from SOFC's so you get electricity you get carbon you get hydrogen and you end up making graphene for batteries
Posted by: SJC | 02 September 2024 at 10:48 AM
Here is an analysis of why we are not using graphene everywhere, in spite of its obvious potential:
https://www.reviews.org/au/technology/graphene/
They boil down to inertia and the upfront costs of changing.
Posted by: Davemart | 02 September 2024 at 11:11 AM
Yes that is the point right now graphene is way too expensive and it's just sort of pie in the sky speculation but if it proves to be advantageous for making batteries they could find a way
Posted by: SJC | 03 September 2024 at 11:38 AM