Electrify America and 4 Gen Logistics launch first phase of electrification project at Port of Long Beach, California
BMW using two DesignWerk electric trucks for transport logistics for e-component production

DOE awards $58.5M to 11 projects to help develop commercially viable atmospheric CO2 removal industry

The US Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management (FECM), with DOE’s Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office (HFTO), announced more than $58.5 million in federal funding for projects to help develop a commercially viable carbon dioxide (CO2) removal industry in the United States. The funding will support pilot projects and testing facilities to demonstrate and scale atmospheric CO2 removal technologies.

To support an emerging and necessary carbon dioxide removal industry, in 2021 DOE launched the Carbon Negative Shot—the US government’s first major carbon dioxide removal effort. Part of DOE’s larger Energy Earthshots Initiative, the Carbon Negative Shot is a Department-wide call for crosscutting innovation and commercialization of a wide range of carbon dioxide removal technologies and approaches.

This Earthshot sets the portfolio-wide goal of reducing the cost of removing CO2 from the atmosphere to less than $100 per net metric ton of CO2-equivalent by 2032, together with robust measurement, monitoring, reporting, and verification and secure storage.

The selected projects will aim to support Carbon Negative Shot objectives across carbon dioxide removal pathways through integrated pilot-scale testing of advanced technologies and detailed monitoring, reporting, and verification protocols.

HFTO will manage the following project that supports small-scale biomass carbon removal and storage technology:

  • Mote, Inc. (Los Angeles, California) will utilize wood waste to demonstrate a gasification system for hydrogen production coupled with CO2 capture.

DOE’s National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), under the purview of FECM, will manage the remaining 10 projects. Four of these projects will also support small-scale biomass carbon removal and storage technology:

  • Arbor Energy and Resources Corporation (El Segundo, California) will utilize unmarketable forest waste from land management practices, storing the inherent carbon in the biomass while producing power using a supercritical CO2 power system.

  • Carba, Inc. (Minneapolis, Minnesota) will convert biomass to charcoal to demonstrate permanent CO2 storage as solid carbon underground in oxygen-free chambers.

  • Carbon Lockdown Project Benefit LLC (Silver Spring, Maryland) will implement pilot biomass burial projects at three sites in the Appalachian region, demonstrating the utilization of a variety of residual biomass sources for carbon removal.

  • Clemson University (Clemson, South Carolina) will demonstrate the injection of wood particles into the subsurface as a method for removing carbon from the atmosphere and storing it in geologic formations with high permanence.

Four projects will support enhanced mineralization technologies:

  • Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University (Stanford, California) intends to test a new enhanced weathering technology designed to enable rapid and scalable carbon dioxide removal in soil and durable storage as bicarbonate ions.

  • Eion Corp (Princeton, New Jersey) plans to implement a digital measurement, reporting, and verification platform for a terrestrial enhanced weathering technology.

  • Lithos Carbon (Dover, Delaware) will implement enhanced rock weathering on more than 3,000 acres of agricultural land in the southeastern United States, notably North Carolina.

  • Northwestern University (Chicago, Illinois) will demonstrate an innovative enhanced weathering mineralization methodology for removing atmospheric CO2 that will help Midwest farmers durably store carbon as dissolved bicarbonate.

Two projects will support testbed facilities suitable for evaluating, developing, and integrating multiple carbon dioxide removal pathways across different ecosystems, climates, and communities:

  • Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State University (Tempe, Arizona) will expand their existing testbed to evaluate direct air capture systems that capture CO2 suitable for geologic storage or mineralization; grown and waste biomass carbon dioxide removal processed into biochar as an amendment to soils, low carbon concrete, and asphalt materials; and marine carbon dioxide removal pathways.

  • University of North Dakota Energy & Environmental Research Center (Grand Forks, North Dakota) will expand its existing test facilities to facilitate carbon dioxide removal technology transition testing from laboratory-scale concepts to integrated pilot-scale carbon dioxide removal systems.

Comments

theblight

This is so sad! A long list of wasted money spent on, well, children playing in a sandbox, imagining they are building a skyscraper. while we pump millions of gallons of oil from Texas, somewhere ele we are going to push sawdust underground to reduce atmosphereic CO2? is this a comedy skit on late night TV?

Biochar is a fairly mature industry, based on the ancient abilityto make charcoal. No one is honestly maginig a technical breakthrough is going to suddenly lower the cost of biochar.
From the Pacific Biochar.com ..Biochar production costs are currently between $200 and $1000 per ton, averaging around $400 for the majority of producers (Li et al. 2017; Sahoo et al. 2019), ..

SJC

There are more than 10,000 abandoned wells just in East Texas you have to make sure they're not leaking those are perfect places to store power plant CO2
You don't have to separate it from the nox put the nox in CO2 in the well you separate the CO2 out when you have a use for it materials and fuels and the nox you have a use nitrogen fertilizer

yoatmon

Excuse me SJC, have you been drinking or snuffing sud? I appreciate most of your past comments but what you are presenting her beats the bucket.

SJC

You're gonna have to do better to clarify your comment than that you can use the carbon and nitrogen search around the web you'll see but stop being insulting

SJC

A seemingly efficient process for producing fertilizer from industrial emitted nitrogen oxides is being launched in The Netherlands.
https://envirotecmagazine.com/2021/12/02/gas-purification-converts-nox-to-fertilizer/

SJC

Depleted oil and gas reservoirs:
CO2 can be injected into old oil and gas wells to enhance recovery of remaining hydrocarbons while also being stored.
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=Storing+CO2+NOX+from+power+plants

SJC

"NOx" (nitrogen oxides) can be converted into a form usable as nitrogen fertilizer through a process that essentially transforms the nitrogen oxides into nitrate, a readily absorbable form for plants, often achieved through technologies that use catalysts to react with water and oxygen in the air, effectively turning air pollution into a usable fertilizer; this is an emerging area of research with potential to mitigate environmental impact from NOx emissions while providing a source of nitrogen for agriculture.

rjs

SJC, how can you possibly conceive of this as a positive?

CO2 can be injected into old oil and gas wells to enhance recovery of remaining hydrocarbons while also being stored.

those hydrocarbons you recover will inevitably generate more CO2 than you injected into the wells to begin with...not counting the energy from whatever source you use to effect the injection and recovery...

rjs

commercially viable atmospheric CO2 removal will never happen, because the physics doesn't work...while it varies quite a bit, in general materials in a gaseous state are about 1000 times less dense than they are as a liquid or solid...hence, burning a liter of a hydrocarbon fuel yields about 1000 liters of CO2...there is no way to get that 1000 liter genie back into a 1 liter bottle for less than the cost of burning that fuel (ie, commercially viable)

likewise, the CO2 emissions from burning a ton of coal are equal to 3.67 times the weight of the carbon in the coal, and would occupy about 1000 times the space of the coal if they could be concentrated from the air they've dispersed in...there's no way to capture those CO2 emissions that would be less than the cost of burning that coal..

DOE has to come to grips with the fact that atmospheric CCS will never be a solution, and move on..

rjs

i didn't do a very effective job at explaining why atmospheric CCS can never be a viable solution...my point is that if it takes the energy equivalent of 3 tons of coal to capture and store the CO2 emissions from one ton of coal, any attempts to do so just make things worse...not to say politicians won't spread a lot of cash around trying it, just to point out that it's pointless....

The comments to this entry are closed.