SAE International and EUROCAE publish first global guidelines for airport hydrogen fueling stations
12 November 2024
SAE International and EUROCAE jointly announced the publication of “Hydrogen Fueling Stations for Airports, in Both Gaseous and Liquid Form.” These documents serve as the first worldwide hydrogen station guidelines for the aerospace industry.
SAE AIR8466, developed in collaboration with EUROCAE’s ER034, provides the first step in defining performance targets and safety limits to enable hydrogen as an accessible fuel for various commercial aircrafts. Considering the wide range of aircraft with hydrogen storage sizes, SAE AIR8466 and EUROCAE ER034 also define fueling categories for hydrogen eVTOLs, Regional, Narrow body and Widebody (including Lighter than Air).
Hydrogen fueling process limits (including the fuel temperature, the maximum flow rate, time required, etc.) are affected by factors such as ambient temperature, fuel delivery temperature, and initial pressure in the hydrogen storage system. The further goal is to establish basic fueling protocols within these limits as a starting point while evaluating minimum criteria, including evaluation of fueling with or without communications. AIR8466 establishes the protocol and process limits for hydrogen fueling of aircraft and plans to establish fueling protocols starting with small aircraft. Optionally, communications may be used, and a general description will be included.
—SAE AIR8466
SAE AIR8466 sets the stage for hydrogen fueling at airports by closing a major aerospace industry gap. There are plenty of airport standards for fueling jet A-1 fuel, but there haven’t been any standardization efforts yet for hydrogen stations.
It was quite a coordination between international aircraft OEMs, Tier 1 suppliers, regulators and hydrogen companies to find consensus on an airport hydrogen fueling station guideline, but we did it. This is a guidebook for hydrogen safety and fueling station definitions. The SAE AIR8466/ EUROCAE ER034 gives the industry a starting point for fueling stations for hydrogen aircraft in gaseous and liquid form.
—Jesse Schneider (ZEV Station) chair of the SAE AE-5CH Hydrogen Airport Taskgroup
Key highlights of this guideline document include:
Range of estimated hydrogen storage onboard based per aircraft type and use case.
Categorization of hydrogen fueling speeds (flow rates in kg/minute), based on airline turnaround time, which gives a first definition of coupling size categories.
Fueling Process Parameter definitions for gaseous hydrogen and liquid hydrogen fueling of aircraft at airports and mobile and stationary station use cases.
High-level hydrogen properties including safety definitions.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cz7wp777780o
' According to the Transport & Environment study, some 80% of the warming associated with contrails is generated by just 3% of flights.
Tweaking the flight paths of a handful of aircraft could reduce contrail warming by more than half by 2040, at a cost of less than £4 per flight.'
Airbus, Zero Avia and others are now clearly showing that at least for regional aircraft hydrogen at near zero emissions, contrails excluded, hydrogen without the vast and problematic addition of carbonm probably from plants which could instead be actively used to sequester carbon, can do the job
If we can be bothered, and not be held captive by vested interests
Posted by: Davemart | 13 November 2024 at 03:57 AM
Presumably much of a contrail is water vapor,
burning hydrogen produces lots of that.
Posted by: SJC | 13 November 2024 at 11:41 AM
@SJC
Its pretty early days to get a firm handle on 'How much' for hydrogen planes vs kerosene as there are too many variables.
More water vapour but less soot and ice for them to form around, and of course fuel cell planes will behave rather differently to hydrogen combustion planes
https://aviationweek.com/aerospace/emerging-technologies/hydrogen-contrails-will-have-lower-climate-impact-study-says
https://www.aef.org.uk/2024/01/24/what-are-the-likely-non-co2-impacts-of-hydrogen-planes/
At the moment about the most we can say is that both Kerosene and hydrogen aircraft should be modifying their flight plans where needed to minimise contrails, albeit that will marginally increase costs.
Posted by: Davemart | 13 November 2024 at 01:23 PM