ARPA-E awarding $38M to 9 projects to reduce ethanol-related emissions; TEOSYNTE
DOE awarding $68M to three SuperTruck Charge projects

Hino to pay $237M settlement to California; part of $1.5B federal settlement

California Attorney General Rob Bonta and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) announced a $236.5-million settlement with heavy-duty engine manufacturer Hino Motors, Ltd., Hino Motors Manufacturing U.S.A. Inc. and Hino Motors Sales U.S.A. Inc. (collectively, Hino), a subsidiary of Toyota Motors Corporation. It is part of a larger federal settlement for $1.5 billion.

.pThe resolution involves CARB; the California Attorney General; US Department of Justice, both civil and criminal; US Environmental Protection Agency; US Customs and Border Protection; and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

Hino failed to comply with California laws and regulations, as well as the Clean Air Act, by fabricating, altering, and omitting data in its certification applications. Hino failed to disclose Auxiliary Emission Control Devices that affected the emissions control systems in its engine software resulting in increased oxides of nitrogen (NOx) emissions. Hino also conducted changes to the engines after the certification application was granted without notifying CARB, as required by the regulations.

The settlement includes approximately $30.3 million to compensate CARB’s Hybrid and Zero-Emission Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Project (HVIP) and settle the California Attorney General’s claims that Hino fraudulently obtained low emissions vehicle subsidies from the state and allegedly violated California laws including the False Claims Act and Unfair Competition Law. The settlement also includes a payment of about $206 million to CARB for civil penalties and mitigation programs to reduce excess NOx emissions. Hino also agreed to provide a voluntary fix for some of the affected vehicles at no cost to owners.

CARB’s investigation began in 2019 when Hino’s certification applications were reviewed and found inconsistencies in the emissions data. CARB worked alongside the US Environmental Protection Agency, and further testing revealed undisclosed and unapproved auxiliary emission control devices on 2010-2019 model year J05E and J08E heavy-duty engines used in both on-road trucks and off-road equipment. These engines were found to emit excess NOx, with some models emitting several times more than allowed by federal and state standards.

The Attorney General's office found that Hino defrauded CARB into accepting Hino’s trucks into the HVIP, a program that incentivizes the sale of approved hybrid vehicles, by using state funds to provide point-of-sale discounts. Hino qualified for HVIP incentive funding by falsely claiming that its trucks complied with state and federal law. The original misrepresentations occurred in 2012, and all Hino models approved for HVIP in the following eight years relied on the original HVIP approval. Under the HVIP, dealers were able to sell Hino trucks at discounted prices. The dealers would then submit vouchers to CARB for payment. The vouchers for each truck ranged from $7,500 to $37,000, and CARB received a total of 1,606 fraudulent vouchers.

After a voluntary disclosure by Hino of false statements in its HVIP application, the Attorney General found that Hino violated state laws including the False Claims Act and Unfair Competition Law. Hino regularly altered emission test data, conducted tests improperly, or entirely fabricated data without conducting any underlying tests. Hino also failed to disclose multiple software functions that could reduce the effectiveness of the emission control systems in their engines, increasing emissions that harm Californians’ health and safety.

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.