Daimler Buses delivers 10 eCitaro G fuel cell vehicles with new H₂ drive mode to Stuttgart
ZF introducing next generation range extender

McKinsey study highlights strong regional differences in EV uptake

McKinsey’s latest Mobility Consumer Pulse Survey, conducted annually in major automotive markets worldwide since 2016, sheds light on recent market twists, including the impact of Chinese EVs, vehicle features that consumers find most compelling, and the perceived obstacles that make buyers hesitant to transition from an internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle to an EV.

The 2025 survey is still ongoing and will eventually include respondents from nine countries. Results gathered during the first wave, which included respondents from China, Europe, and the United States, provide some initial insight into the market.

Although EV uptake has increased worldwide, it has always varied by region, McKinsey notes. In 2024, for example, about 50% of vehicles sold in China were EVs. Of these, 28% were battery electric vehicles (BEVs), 15% plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), and 6% extended-range electric vehicles (EREVs). China is the only market where EREVs are now available at scale.

By contrast, EVs accounted for only 21% of vehicles sold in Europe (14% BEV, 7% PHEV). EV sales were lowest in the United States, at 10% (8% BEV, 2% PHEV), with uptake varying vastly by state and region.

Across regions, EV purchase intent is highest among customers who already have experience with an EV. This also includes multicar households that currently have an ICE and a BEV, with the majority indicating they will replace their ICE with a BEV as their next car. This finding contradicts the commonly held assumptions that BEVs are only used as the secondary household car, driven for shorter trips, and that consumers may keep an ICE as backup in their garage forever, McKinsey says.

EV uptake is likely to continue to grow across regions. In China, 45% of respondents state that their next car will be a BEV; this compares with 23% in Europe and 12% in the United States. In a departure from current sales trends, customer intent to purchase a PHEV is higher than intent to buy a BEV in the United States and Europe, and it is almost as high as BEV intent in China. These findings highlight the continued relevance of hybrids in the EV transition.

IMG_1550

In the United States, EV sales and consumer interest in EV purchases have remained flat over the past few years, but the results vary significantly by location (by state and by specific location within a state). In states that have adopted the rules of the California Air Resource Board (CARB), for example, 38% of respondents state that their next car will be electric (BEV or PHEV), compared with 25% in non-CARB states.

EV purchase intent is highest in California (above 50%) but is well below 20% in about 25 other states, mostly in the South and Midwest. The contrast between residents of urban and rural areas is equally stark: EV transition sentiment in urban areas (51%) is more than 2.5 times higher than that in rural areas (18%). Purchase intent for hybrid EVs—both plug-in and full hybrids—is higher than that for BEVs. These trends suggest that the overall EV transition in the United States will continue at a slow pace, and ICE and hybrid-electric-vehicle (HEV) technology will remain relevant over the longer term. OEMs should review their portfolios accordingly, McKinsey suggested.

Comments

Bernard

The key point is that almost no one is moving back to fossil cars after buying an EV. Electrification will be slow in some markets, but it is inevitable.

The plan for oil companies is to convince enough people that they should buy a fake EV (plug-in or plain hybrid), to keep them paying for another decade. That seems to be working in the US, but not in the rest of the planet.

Roger Pham

Hi Bernard,
There are several oil companies who are investing in EVs and RE:
Saudi Aramco invests in Lucid EV maker.
Now that EVs are mainstream, Big Oil is putting money into them. Business Insider reported that oil companies like BP, Shell, and ExxonMobil are investing in battery technologies, charging infrastructure, and lithium mining.
The oil companies that have been investing in EV charging stations the most are: Shell, TotalEnergies, BP, and Eni. Following them but with slower developments are: Repsol, Pkn Orlen, Petronas, Chevron, and Phillips 66.

Shell has invested in the development of a variety of renewable energy projects such as solar, wind, and biofuels. Shell’s solar power projects are spread across the world with operational projects in the Netherlands, Oman, and upcoming projects in Australia and Canada. Shell’s wind power portfolio includes onshore as well as offshore wind power projects, with the majority of projects being offshore. Shell has also expanded its renewable energy portfolio through acquisitions.

BP plans on building 50GW of renewable energy capacity by 2030. In wind energy, BP has several running projects in the US and is working to set up new capacity via collaborations with energy players such as Equinor. BP’s solar energy affiliate Lightsource bp is aggressively pursuing new capacities and aims to develop 10GW of solar projects by 2023.

TotalEnergies
The company plans on being a strong player in the renewable electricity value chain by strengthening its production, storage, and distribution portfolios. TotalEnergies is targeting the installation of 100GW of renewable power generation capacity by 2030. The company has established solar and wind power projects across the globe and is already supplying electricity in countries such as Chile, Japan, and South Africa.

Conclusion: "It doesn't matter whether a cat is black or white, as long as it catches mice."
It doesn't matter what kind of car or energy you invest in as long as it gives you good return on your investment.

The comments to this entry are closed.